Hello All,
Just wanted to resend this again.
Regards,
~~Rick
- Original Message -
From: "Rick King"
To: gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Saturday, November 6, 2010 12:23:13 AM
Subject: [Gluster-users] Release Roadmap
Hello All,
Quick question: Is there a link we can re
Hello All,
Quick question: Is there a link we can reference to check targeted dates for
upcoming releases?
Regards,
~~Rick
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it ('Message') is
intended only for the use of the recepient (s) named and may contain
confidential informat
Thank you Craig. I tried to access the bug to add my address to the CC list,
but it looks like the bug is not viewable.
~~Rick
- Original Message -
From: "Craig Carl"
To: "Rick King"
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org, "Matt Hodson"
Sent: Wednesda
Thank you Craig. I tried to access the bug to add my address to the CC list,
but it looks like the bug is not viewable.
~~Rick
- Original Message -
From: "Craig Carl"
To: "Rick King"
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org, "Matt Hodson"
Sent: Wednesda
Craig, Can you let us know the bug number? I ran into this as well.
~~Rick
- Original Message -
From: "Craig Carl"
To: "Matt Hodson"
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 12:41:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] cannot nfs mount glusterFS
There is a bug file
Hello Kaushik,
I am a newbie myself. What's the peer status?
gluster peer status
What command are you using to create the volume?
My best to you,
~~Rick
- Original Message -
From: "kaushik chatterjee"
To: gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Monday, November 1, 2010 10:54:02 AM
Subj
, November 1, 2010 8:38:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Possible to use gluster w/ email services +
Tuning for fast replication
On Tuesday 02 November 2010 10:04:27 Rick King wrote:
> Ed, thank you for your response!
>
> >> Are you examining the second node directly, ie
Ed, thank you for your response!
>> Are you examining the second node directly, ie not by mounting it?
This is an interesting question. I am just examining the 2nd node directly, it
wasn't obvious to me that the 2nd node needed to mount the data from the 1st
node. I was just merely expecting th
Ed, thank you for your response!
>> Are you examining the second node directly, ie not by mounting it?
This is an interesting question. I am just examining the 2nd node directly, it
wasn't obvious to me that the 2nd node needed to mount the data from the 1st
node. I was just merely expecting th
My current volume info:
Volume Name: test
Type: Replicate
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 2
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: hostnameA:/opt
Brick2: hostnameB:/opt
Options Reconfigured:
performance.cache-size: 6GB
Greatly appreciate anyone has any pointers on how to improve replication.
rd
option working-directory /etc/glusterd
option transport-type tcp
option transport.socket.keepalive-time 10
option transport.socket.keepalive-interval 2
end-volume
Any advice or corrections would be greatly appreciated!
My best to you,
--
Rick King
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any
11 matches
Mail list logo
