Any update here? Can I hope to see a fix incorporated into the release of
3.6.3 ?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 03/31/2015 10:47 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
>
> Pranith and Atin,
>
> Thank you for looking
hat do you think would be the
timeline for fixing this issue? What version do you expect to see this
fixed in?
In the meantime, is there another workaround that you might suggest besides
running a secondary mount later after the boot is over?
Thank you again for your help,
Rumen Telbizov
On T
imeout: 60
I run Debian 7 and the following GlusterFS version 3.6.2-2.
While I could together some rc.local type of script which retries to mount
the volume for a while until it succeeds or times out I was wondering if
there's a better way to solve this problem?
Thank you for your help.
Thank you once again for your input. It's highly appreciated.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Melkor Lord wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Rumen Telbizov
> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your answer Melkor.
>>
>
> You're welcome!
>
>
>> Th
Thank you for your answer Melkor.
This is the kind of experience I was looking for actually. I am happy that
it has worked fine for you.
Anybody coming across any issues while reading directly from the underlying
disk?
Thank you again,
Rumen Telbizov
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:29 AM, Melkor
the local disk but I want to be
certain that those reads, in terms of correctness and consistency, will be
equivalent to reading of the shared drive itself.
Thank you in advance for sharing your experience.
Regards,
--
Rumen Telbizov
Unix Systems Administrator <http://telbizov.com>
___
Am I the only one experiencing this? Do you guys have proper statistics?
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have the following situation. I put some read and write load on my test
> GlusterFS setup as follows:
>
> # dd if=/dev/z
out: 10
nfs.disable: on
client.ssl: off
server.ssl: off
Has anyone else experienced this?
Regards,
--
Rumen Telbizov
Unix Systems Administrator <http://telbizov.com>
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
d for stable production
work? 3.5 or 3.6?
Regards,
Rumen Telbizov
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with your setup. This is a known issue (at least to
> me).
>
> The problem here lies with how GlusterD collect and collate the
> inf
k02/brick
Options Reconfigured:
nfs.disable: on
network.ping-timeout: 10
I run:
# glusterd -V
glusterfs 3.5.3 built on Nov 17 2014 15:48:52
Repository revision: git://git.gluster.com/glusterfs.git
Thank you for your time.
Regards,
--
Rumen Telbizov
Unix Systems Administrator <http://telbiz
10 matches
Mail list logo