On 5 May 2015, at 04:24, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 4 May 2015, at 12:52, Soumya Deb wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Gluster 3.7 release is nearing & I was really expecting to have a brand new
> > website to look forward to with the new release (along with the new doc
Hi all,
Gluster 3.7 release is nearing & I was really expecting to have a brand new
website to look forward to with the new release (along with the new docs).
Last discussion we had, was inconclusive on the mailing list. I had a chance to
catch up with DV, tigert, Vijay & Sankarshan. It was sti
To avoid getting lost in long paraphrasing - very much agreed with Joe.
MediaWiki or else, docs needs a platform essentially "meant for docs".
And shouldn't be a sub-part of the promo-page/landing site's contents.
The way /documentation does it for now, is barely scalable, if ever.
The analogy
On 2015/04/08 at 21:42, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Soumya Deb wrote:
>
> > I've put together some more stuff on the site.
> > Staging URL: http://code.debs.io/glusterweb/
>
> The addition of new aspects/content to the stag
Hello all,
I came to realize, the entire discussion about why to revamp Gluster website is
fragmented across threads & links. Thought it might be a good opportunity to
post a brief, yet cover-all write up on why this is necessary.
There are three primary facets to the challenges we are facing,
map - not much to show.
- Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Soumya Deb wrote:
> > Here's the staging page: http://code.debs.io/glusterweb/
>
> This looks nice and is a good change from the current look-n-feel.
Thanks, glad that you liked t
Hi folks,
I've had published my blog a while ago about revamping the Gluster project site
(http://blog.debs.io/3) & it's never enough just to talk about something,
unless I can actively contribute to make it better. Hence, I've taken a stab at
revamping the landing site & with (almost!) true op
