SOLVED:
Problem was caused by bug affecting servers with more than 40 CPUs
visible - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/15062/
Rebalance works after upgrading to 3.10.4.
Many thanks to Nithya for help!
Best regards,
Szymon Miotk
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Szymon Miotk wrote:
> Hi Nit
exactly is gluster index.
Best regards,
Szymon Miotk
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Nithya Balachandran
wrote:
> Hi Szymon,
>
> I have received the files and will take a look and get back to you.
>
> In what context are you seeing index?
>
> Thanks,
> Nithya
>
> On
Hi Nithya,
the files were sent to priv to avoid spamming the list with large attachments.
Could someone explain what is index in Gluster?
Unfortunately index is popular word, so googling is not very helpful.
Best regards,
Szymon Miotk
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Nithya Balachandran wrote
luster/distribute.so(gf_defrag_start_crawl+0x6d3)[0x7f24d8529ce3]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(synctask_wrap+0x12)[0x7f24de255822]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x498b0)[0x7f24dd6258b0]
Anybody has a clue how to fix 'failed to get index' error?
Than
Hello,
I have problems with tuning Gluster for optimal small files performance.
My usage scenario is, as I've learned, worst possible scenario, but
it's not up to me to change it:
- small 1KB files
- at least 20M of those
- approx. 10 files/directory
- mostly writes
- average speed 1000 files/sec
Dear Gluster community,
I have problems with tuning Gluster for small files performance on SSD.
My usage scenario is, as I've learned, worst possible scenario, but
it's not up to me to change it:
- small 1KB files
- at least 20M of those
- approx. 10 files/directory
- mostly writes
- average spee
