On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 05:31:36PM +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks to everyone who responded to the recent community survey [1], we have
> an idea of what you think would be necessary in GlusterFS. I have tried to
> collate the wishlist of features under appropriate categories here
In recent past, I opened many feature pages (proposals) with openstack
usecase (mainly using Manila as the openstack service) against glusterfs.
Listing them here to see what from these can make it to glusterfs.next. We
definitely need most if not all of these features to gel GlusterFS nicely
(read
An object interface to GlusterFS would greatly benefit Swift integration
efforts. Currently swiftonfile project uses FUSE mount to perform I/O on
GlusterFS volumes. Moving to libgfapi would increase performance if there were
an object interface. May be something like this:
glfs_put(object_path,
