Re: [Gluster-users] Again on GlusterFS and active/active WAN Replication

2014-02-17 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 02/13/2014 11:29 PM, Gionatan Danti wrote: Hi All, I have a few questions about GlusterFS used in active/active WAN-based replication scenarios. Let first start with a little ASCII chart: HQ Linux w/SMB share - low speed link - Remote Linux w/SMB share - WIN7 clients In short I had to

Re: [Gluster-users] Again on GlusterFS and active/active WAN Replication

2014-02-17 Thread Gionatan Danti
On 02/17/2014 11:18 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: write-behind can help with write operations but the lookup preceding the write is sent out to all bricks today and hence that affects overall performance. Ok, this is in-line with my tests and the auto-generated configuration files Not as of

Re: [Gluster-users] Again on GlusterFS and active/active WAN Replication

2014-02-17 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 02/17/2014 04:42 PM, Gionatan Danti wrote: On 02/17/2014 11:18 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: write-behind can help with write operations but the lookup preceding the write is sent out to all bricks today and hence that affects overall performance. Ok, this is in-line with my tests and the

[Gluster-users] Again on GlusterFS and active/active WAN Replication

2014-02-13 Thread Gionatan Danti
Hi All, I have a few questions about GlusterFS used in active/active WAN-based replication scenarios. Let first start with a little ASCII chart: HQ Linux w/SMB share - low speed link - Remote Linux w/SMB share - WIN7 clients In short I had to replicate a local server share on a remote