On 30/09/2014, at 11:58 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 30/09/2014, at 11:38 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
>> On 30/09/2014, at 3:53 AM, Venky Shankar wrote:
>>>
>>> Absolutely. Please go ahead with F20.
>>
>> Thanks. :)
>
> There's an initial Fedora 20 VM online, named btrfs1.cloud.gluster.org.
So, fo
On 30/09/2014, at 11:38 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 30/09/2014, at 3:53 AM, Venky Shankar wrote:
>>
>> Absolutely. Please go ahead with F20.
>
> Thanks. :)
There's an initial Fedora 20 VM online, named btrfs1.cloud.gluster.org.
Doing some initial testing on it using xfs to verify things, figu
On 30/09/2014, at 3:53 AM, Venky Shankar wrote:
> > How critical is it for this to be F21 instead of F20? If it's
> > really important, then I'll start getting really creative to get
> > F21 on there. But it's likely to be a bit of a time suck with
> > experimentation.
>
> Not critical at all.
On Sep 30, 2014 5:00 AM, "Justin Clift" wrote:
>
> On 25/09/2014, at 7:53 AM, Venky Shankar wrote:
>
> > Wanted to check if anyone out here uses BTRFS (and willing to share
their experiences[1]) as the backend filesystem for GlusterFS. We're
planning to explore some of it's features and put it to
On 25/09/2014, at 7:53 AM, Venky Shankar wrote:
> Wanted to check if anyone out here uses BTRFS (and willing to share their
> experiences[1]) as the backend filesystem for GlusterFS. We're planning to
> explore some of it's features and put it to use for GlusterFS. This was
> discussed briefly
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> reflink for backup is really a bad idea since you will not have really made
> a second copy - if the disk fails (even partially!) you might lose data
> since we will not have a second copy of the blocks. Where it is not
> supported, you will st
On 09/26/2014 03:40 PM, James wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 09/26/2014 01:58 PM, James wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Venky Shankar
wrote:
Hey folks,
Wanted to check if anyone out here uses BTRFS (and willing to share their
experiences[1]) as the bac
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 09/26/2014 01:58 PM, James wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Venky Shankar
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey folks,
>>>
>>> Wanted to check if anyone out here uses BTRFS (and willing to share their
>>> experiences[1]) as the backend filesys
On 09/26/2014 01:58 PM, James wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Venky Shankar wrote:
Hey folks,
Wanted to check if anyone out here uses BTRFS (and willing to share their
experiences[1]) as the backend filesystem for GlusterFS. We're planning to
explore some of it's features and put it to
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Venky Shankar wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Wanted to check if anyone out here uses BTRFS (and willing to share their
> experiences[1]) as the backend filesystem for GlusterFS. We're planning to
> explore some of it's features and put it to use for GlusterFS. This was
>
On 09/25/2014 12:23 PM, Venky Shankar wrote:
Hey folks,
Wanted to check if anyone out here uses BTRFS (and willing to share
their experiences[1]) as the backend filesystem for GlusterFS. We're
planning to explore some of it's features and put it to use for
GlusterFS. This was discussed brief
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Venky Shankar wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Wanted to check if anyone out here uses BTRFS (and willing to share their
> experiences[1]) as the backend filesystem for GlusterFS. We're planning to
> explore some of it's features and put it to use for GlusterFS. This was
Hey folks,
Wanted to check if anyone out here uses BTRFS (and willing to share
their experiences[1]) as the backend filesystem for GlusterFS. We're
planning to explore some of it's features and put it to use for
GlusterFS. This was discussed briefly during the weekly meeting on
#gluster-meeti
13 matches
Mail list logo
