Re: [Gluster-users] Comparison with other SDS

2016-11-14 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
2016-11-14 12:51 GMT+01:00 Lindsay Mathieson : > Of course if you're running a replica volume, non-dispersed you should > only need to do lookups locally. It would be interesting to know if thats a > optimization gluster does. I have a replica 2 with only 2 bricks,

Re: [Gluster-users] Comparison with other SDS

2016-11-14 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On 14/11/2016 9:00 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: Can someone explain me why Lizard is 10 times faster than gluster? This is not a flame, I would only like to know the technical differences between these two software Its my understanding that with many/small file operations involving

Re: [Gluster-users] Comparison with other SDS

2016-11-14 Thread Jean R. Franco
.org> Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 14 de novembro de 2016 9:00:00 Assunto: [Gluster-users] Comparison with other SDS I did a very simple and stupid LizardFS installation this weekend. Same configuration as gluster, same nodes, same disks. Both set with replica 2, same ZFS filesystem on each disks/brick