Hello all,
I'm setting up GlusterFS on 2 hw w/ same configuration, 8 hdds. This
deployment will grow later on.
I'm undecided between these different configurations and am seeing comments
or advice from more experienced users of GlusterFS.
Here is the summary of 3 options:
1. 1 brick per host, G
Il 09/09/20 15:30, Miguel Mascarenhas Filipe ha scritto:
I'm a noob, but IIUC this is the option giving the best performance:
> 2. 1 brick per drive, Gluster "distributed replicated" volumes, no
> internal redundancy
Clients can write to both servers in parallel and read scattered (read
performa
Il 2020-09-09 15:30 Miguel Mascarenhas Filipe ha scritto:
I'm setting up GlusterFS on 2 hw w/ same configuration, 8 hdds. This
deployment will grow later on.
Hi, I really suggest avoiding a replica 2 cluster unless it is for
testing only. Be sure to add an arbiter at least (using a replica 2
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 21:53, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> Il 2020-09-09 15:30 Miguel Mascarenhas Filipe ha scritto:
> > I'm setting up GlusterFS on 2 hw w/ same configuration, 8 hdds. This
> > deployment will grow later on.
>
> Hi, I really suggest avoiding a replica 2 cluster unless it is for
> tes
Il 2020-09-10 23:13 Miguel Mascarenhas Filipe ha scritto:
can you explain better how a single disk failing would bring a whole
node out of service?
Oh, I did a bad cut/paste. A single disk failure will not put the entire
node out-of-service. The main point was the potentially long heal time
(
