Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-08-17 Thread Somsak Sriprayoonsakul
>>>> /gluster to /usr/home instead (the web application needs it). Then I >>>> tried >>>> to strace the httpd process and found that httpd crash at the points >>>> where >>>> httpd tried to read configuration file stored on G

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-08-14 Thread Raghavendra G
;>>> Sriprayoonsakul wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thank you very much for you reply >>>>> >>>>> At the time we used 2.0.3, and yes we used stock Apache from CentOS. I >>>>> >>>> will >>>> >>>>

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-08-06 Thread Shehjar Tikoo
Hi I've filed a bug report which you can track at: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=194 Please do add your email to the CC list and also upload the volfiles which you're using with this test. Thanks Shehjar Somsak Sriprayoonsakul wrote: The behavior is still the same

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-08-05 Thread Somsak Sriprayoonsakul
t;>> >>> lots >>> >>>> of error with plain 'ls' command (but giving the correct output). Also, >>>> >>> with >>> >>> Can you mail those errors? >>> >>> booster, Apache process refuse to start. I wil

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-08-03 Thread Shehjar Tikoo
ster.org Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 3:46:14 AM GMT +04:00 Abu Dhabi / Muscat Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue I haven't tried an apples to apples comparison with Apache+mod_gluster vs Apache+fuse+gluster however i do run both setups. I

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-08-03 Thread Somsak Sriprayoonsakul
e to start. I will try 2.0.4 to see if it >>> > improves. If not, I will attach error log next time. >>> >>> logs are very much appreciated. >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > 2009/7/30 Raghavendra G >>> >> >>&g

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-08-02 Thread Somsak Sriprayoonsakul
ut giving the correct output). Also, >>>> >>> with >>> >>> Can you mail those errors? >>> >>> booster, Apache process refuse to start. I will try 2.0.4 to see if it >>>> improves. If not, I will attach error log next time. >>&

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-08-02 Thread Shehjar Tikoo
m: "Liam Slusser" To: "Somsak Sriprayoonsakul" Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 3:46:14 AM GMT +04:00 Abu Dhabi / Muscat Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue I haven't tried an apples to apples comp

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-08-02 Thread Somsak Sriprayoonsakul
t; >> >> >> Hi Somsak, >> >> >> >> Sorry for the delayed reply. Below you've mentioned that you've >> problems >> >> with apache and booster. Going forward, Apache over booster will be the >> >> preferred approach. Can

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-08-02 Thread Somsak Sriprayoonsakul
erstand you are using apache 2.2, am I correct? > >> > >> regards, > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Liam Slusser" > >> To: "Somsak Sriprayoonsakul" > >> Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org > >> Sent: Saturday

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-07-30 Thread Raghavendra G
oach. Can you tell us what version of glusterfs you are using? >> And as I can understand you are using apache 2.2, am I correct? >> >> regards, >> - Original Message - >> From: "Liam Slusser" >> To: "Somsak Sriprayoonsakul" >> Cc

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-07-30 Thread Liam Slusser
nd booster. Going forward, Apache over booster will be the >>> preferred approach. Can you tell us what version of glusterfs you are using? >>> And as I can understand you are using apache 2.2, am I correct? >>> >>> regards, >>> ----- Original Message -----

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-07-30 Thread Somsak Sriprayoonsakul
you tell us what version of glusterfs you are using? >> And as I can understand you are using apache 2.2, am I correct? >> >> regards, >> - Original Message - >> From: "Liam Slusser" < lslus...@gmail.com> >> To: "Somsak Sriprayoonsakul"

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-07-30 Thread Liam Slusser
AM GMT +04:00 Abu Dhabi / Muscat Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue I haven't tried an apples to apples comparison with Apache +mod_gluster vs Apache+fuse+gluster however i do run both setups. I load tested both setups so to verified it coul

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-07-30 Thread Somsak Sriprayoonsakul
lusser" > To: "Somsak Sriprayoonsakul" > Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org > Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 3:46:14 AM GMT +04:00 Abu Dhabi / Muscat > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance > issue > > I haven't tried an apples to app

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-07-29 Thread Raghavendra G
2.2, am I correct? regards, - Original Message - From: "Liam Slusser" To: "Somsak Sriprayoonsakul" Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 3:46:14 AM GMT +04:00 Abu Dhabi / Muscat Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performan

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-07-24 Thread Liam Slusser
I haven't tried an apples to apples comparison with Apache+mod_gluster vs Apache+fuse+gluster however i do run both setups. I load tested both setups so to verified it could handle 4x our normal daily load and left it at that. I didn't actually compare the two (although that might be cool to do s

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-07-23 Thread Liam Slusser
We use mod_gluster and Apache 2.2 with good results. We also ran into the same issue as you that we ran out of memory past 150 threads even on a 8gig machine. We got around this by compiling Apache using mpm-worker (threads) instead of prefork - it uses 1/4 as much ram with the same number of con

Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-07-12 Thread Somsak Sriprayoonsakul
Sorry, I forgot to include informatino about my testbed. 4 machines - Gluster (as described below) 3 machines - WWW server, load balance using LVS 1 machine - LVS direct routing and weighted lease connection 3 machines - clients, 100 threads per client. 2009/7/12 Somsak Sriprayoonsakul > Hello,

[Gluster-users] Gluster 2.0.3 + Apache on CentOS5 performance issue

2009-07-12 Thread Somsak Sriprayoonsakul
Hello, We have been evaluating the choice for the new platform for a webboard system. The webboard is PHP scripts that generate/modify HTML page when user posting/add comment to the page, resulting topic is actually stored as a HTML file with all related file (file attach to the topic, etc.. )stor