On 27/03/2014, at 6:58 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> I see two separate bugs there.
>
> 1. A missing package requirement
> 2. The process hanging in a reproducible way.
>
> I've submitted a fix for #2.
>
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/7360/
Sounds like this should be a late candidate for 3.4.3?
If
- Original Message -
> I see two separate bugs there.
> 1. A missing package requirement
> 2. The process hanging in a reproducible way.
I've submitted a fix for #2.
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/7360/
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-u
>
>Cheers,
>
>Steve
>
>From: Carlos Capriotti [mailto:capriotti.car...@gmail.com]
>Sent: 25 March 2014 12:30
>To: Steve Thomas
>Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
>Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.4.2 on Redhat 6.5
>
>Steve:
>
>Tested that myself - not the nagi
ombie processes are no longer
being "created".
Cheers,
Steve
From: Carlos Capriotti [mailto:capriotti.car...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 March 2014 12:30
To: Steve Thomas
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.4.2 on Redhat 6.5
Steve:
Tested that myself - not
Steve:
Tested that myself - not the nagios part, but the gluster commands you
posted later - and no errors or zombies.
Somebody else reported the same, so, sounds consistent.
There must be another process there biting your gluster, turning it into a
haunted scenario.
Cheers,
Carlos
On Thu, M
let $((bricksfound++))
>else
> errors=("${errors[@]}" "$brick offline")
>fi
>;;
> esac
> done < <( sudo gluster volume status ${VOLUME} detail)
>
>
> Anyone spot why this woul
: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org
[mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Steve Thomas
Sent: 24 March 2014 11:55
To: Carlos Capriotti
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.4.2 on Redhat 6.5
Hi Carlos,
Thanks for coming back to me... in response to your querie
e
errors=("${errors[@]}" "$brick offline")
fi
;;
esac
done < <( sudo gluster volume status ${VOLUME} detail)
Anyone spot why this would be an issue?
Thanks,
Steve
From: Carlos Capriotti [mailto:capriotti.car...@gmail.com]
Sen
ok, let's see if we can gather more info.
I am not a specialist, but you know... another pair of eyes.
My system has a single glusterd process and it has a pretty low PID,
meaning it has not crashed.
What is your PID for your glusterd ? how many zombie processes are there
reported by top ?
I've
Hi all...
Further investigation shows in excess of 500 glusterd zombie processes and
continuing to climb on the box ...
Any suggestions? Am happy to provide logs etc to get to the bottom of this
_
From: Steve Thomas
Sent: 21 March 2014 13:21
To: '
Hi,
I'm running Gluster 3.4.2 on Redhat 6.5 with 4 servers with a brick on each.
This brick is mounted locally and used by apache to server audio files for an
IVR system. Each of these audio files are typically around 80-100Kb.
System appears to be working ok in terms of health and status via g
Hi,
I'm running Gluster 3.4.2 on Redhat 6.5 with 4 servers with a brick on each.
This brick is mounted locally and used by apache to server audio files for an
IVR system. Each of these audio files are typically around 80-100Kb.
System appears to be working ok in terms of health and status via g
12 matches
Mail list logo
