Il 2022-04-03 16:31 Strahil Nikolov ha scritto:
It's not like that, but most of the active developers are from RH and
since RHGS is being EOL-ed - they have other priorities.
Is RHGS going to be totally replaced by Red RHCS?
Thanks.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. -
I see. Looks like there's no interest from the development team to address
the issue.
Zakhar
On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 2:32 PM Strahil Nikolov
wrote:
> Sadly, I can't help but you can join the regular gluster meeting and ask
> for feedback on the topic.
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
>
> On
Hi,
Any news about this? I provided very detailed test results and proof of the
issue https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/3206 on 6 February 2022
but haven't heard back after that.
Best regards,
Zakhar
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 7:14 AM Zakhar Kirpichenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've updated the
Hi Strahil,
Many thanks for your reply! I've updated the Github issue with statedump
files taken before and after the tar operation:
https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/files/8008635/glusterdump.19102.dump.zip
Please disregard that path= entries are empty, in the original dumps there
are real
Hi!
I opened a Github issue https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/3206
but not sure how much attention they get there, so re-posting here just in
case someone has any ideas.
Description of problem:
GlusterFS 9.5, 3-node cluster (2 bricks + arbiter), an attempt to tar the
whole filesystem
