Hello Daniel,
I am following the tips from techforce.com.br blog, those recommend many
tunning options to speed up write and read of small files.
http://www.techforce.com.br/news/linux_blog/glusterfs_tuning_small_files
Bellow the files:
*glusterfsd.vol*
~~
Since most servers come standard with two NIC's these days, an easy fix to
improve write performance in a Distributed / Replicated setup is to have
each server of a replicated pair on different sub-nets.
On the client simply configure NIC 1 to handle traffic on subnet 1, and NIC
2 to handle traffi
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Henrique Haas wrote:
> My GlusterFS settings have used:
> Server: storage/posix, features/locks, performance/io-threads
> Client: 4 remote nodes > 2 Replicate > Write-Behind > IO-Threads > QuickRead
>> Stat-Prefetch
Are you able to share the config file with us?
@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS Performance gigE
Hello,
I've tested with a mesh of performance translators, and use real data:
My testing set have about 600K files, with files with 43KB on average, all
JPEG files.
The total size is about 19GB.
The underline filesystem is
Hello,
I've tested with a mesh of performance translators, and use real data:
My testing set have about 600K files, with files with 43KB on average, all
JPEG files.
The total size is about 19GB.
The underline filesystem is ext4, on its default settings of Ubuntu Server
10.04 (it are configured as
]
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 10:21 AM
To: Jacob Shucart
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS Performance gigE
Hello Jacob,
Greater block sizes gave me much much better results, about 58MB/s on a
1GigE
So.. my concern now is about smaller files be shared
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Henrique Haas wrote:
> Hello Jacob,
>
> Greater block sizes gave me much much better results, about *58MB/s* on a
> 1GigE
> So.. my concern now is about smaller files be shared using Gluster.
> Any tunning tips for these kind of files (I'm using Ext4 and Glust
...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Chris Layton
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 3:32 PM
> To: Henrique Haas
> Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS Performance gigE
>
> I agree something is wrong.
>
> Here is what I am getting on a more ISP g
: gluster-users@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS Performance gigE
I agree something is wrong.
Here is what I am getting on a more ISP grade setup (but no SAN sadly)
also with no Ethernet tuning :
dd if=/dev/zero of=/usr/local/sites/test.test bs=1M count=64
64+0 records in
64+0
I agree something is wrong.
Here is what I am getting on a more ISP grade setup (but no SAN sadly)
also with no Ethernet tuning :
dd if=/dev/zero of=/usr/local/sites/test.test bs=1M count=64
64+0 records in
64+0 records out
67108864 bytes (67 MB) copied, 0.754847 seconds, 88.9 MB/s
dd if=/dev/z
Larry Bates
vitalEsafe, Inc.
--
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:16:52 -0300
From: Henrique Haas
Subject: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS Performance gigE
To: gluster-users@gluster.org
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello peo
Wow, that doesn't sound right! I have a gluster cluster at home using
old P4 hardware, and cheap soho off the shelf gigabit switches, and I
can get ~35MB/s writes with dd:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/vol/scratch/foo/test.img bs=1M count=64
64+0 records in
64+0 records out
67108864 bytes (67 MB) copied, 1.
Hello people,
For those have *GlusterFS running over GigE, what is the throughput you have
for write data?*
I have 3 nodes, running GNU/Linux Ubuntu Server 10.04, GlusterFS 3.0.2.
The network is GigE, dedicated switch.
I am experiencing maximum 2 MB/sec running a "dd" over a client mount point.
13 matches
Mail list logo
