Vijay,
I first reported this problem on this list and in IRC somewhere around
the beginning to middle of last year and have since put all Gluster
integration projects on hold until I can free someone up to actually
start a more in-depth investigation as the situation was pretty much
chalked up to
Hi,
We are using fio(https://github.com/axboe/fio) for load/stress testing.
We have not done performance check on a single node.
I will try to verify it.
Thanks,
Kiran.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
pkara...@redhat.com wrote:
+Kiran Patil may know about this.
Yes, I have activated the SA xattr for my ZFS volume that I use for GlusterFS.
On Thursday, February 5, 2015 12:22 PM, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/02/2015 08:26 PM, ML mail wrote:
Is ZFS using SA based extended attributes here? Since GlusterFS makes
use of extended
On 02/02/2015 08:26 PM, ML mail wrote:
Hello,
I am testing GlusterFS for the first time and have installed the latest
GlusterFS 3.5 stable version on Debian 7 on brand new SuperMicro hardware with
ZFS instead of hardware RAID. My ZFS pool is a RAIDZ-2 with 6 SATA disks of 2
TB each.
After
+Kiran Patil may know about this.
Pranith
On 02/03/2015 12:56 AM, ML mail wrote:
Hello,
I am testing GlusterFS for the first time and have installed the latest
GlusterFS 3.5 stable version on Debian 7 on brand new SuperMicro hardware with
ZFS instead of hardware RAID. My ZFS pool is a
Hello,
I am testing GlusterFS for the first time and have installed the latest
GlusterFS 3.5 stable version on Debian 7 on brand new SuperMicro hardware with
ZFS instead of hardware RAID. My ZFS pool is a RAIDZ-2 with 6 SATA disks of 2
TB each.
After setting up a first and single test brick
