On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Paras Fadte plf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Vikas,
Thanks for the response.
I am having performance issues upon migration to gluster. Follwoing
should explain the issue.
There are scripts running which access data from the gluster mount
point . Earlier NFS
What are the downsides of using performance improving translators ?
There has to be some, or otherwise why not have them on by default?
Thanks
Pablo
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Raghavendra G raghavendra...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Paras Fadte plf...@gmail.com
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Pablo Godel pablo.go...@gmail.com wrote:
What are the downsides of using performance improving translators ?
While there may not be any significant performance decreases, its just that
you will be adding an extra software layer in the path of processing a call.
Hi,
Which settings in AFR in gluster directly affects performance when
there are lots of ls and stat calls made on files mounted using
gluster?
Thank you.
-Paras
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
Hi Vikas,
Thanks for the response.
I am having performance issues upon migration to gluster. Follwoing
should explain the issue.
There are scripts running which access data from the gluster mount
point . Earlier NFS was used . With NFS the scripts seem to have no
problem getting completed
