Yup, that does look quite similar.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:25 PM, harry mangalam wrote:
> Not expected behavior, but one that has been noted before:
>
> Joe Julian posted this only a few days ago - it sounds similar to your
> problem?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849526
>
>
Not expected behavior, but one that has been noted before:
Joe Julian posted this only a few days ago - it sounds similar to your
problem?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849526
On Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:58:50 AM Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> No replies? Surely this can't be
No replies? Surely this can't be expected behavior?
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> Greetings,
> I'm running version 3.3.0 on Fedora16-x86_64. I have two bricks setup
> with a volume doing basic replication on an XFS formatted filesystem.
> I've NFS mounted the volume
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> Greetings,
> I'm running version 3.3.0 on Fedora16-x86_64. I have two bricks setup
> with a volume doing basic replication on an XFS formatted filesystem.
> I've NFS mounted the volume on a 3rd system, and invoked bonnie++ to
> write to t
Greetings,
I'm running version 3.3.0 on Fedora16-x86_64. I have two bricks setup
with a volume doing basic replication on an XFS formatted filesystem.
I've NFS mounted the volume on a 3rd system, and invoked bonnie++ to
write to the NFS mount point. After a few minutes, I noticed that
bonnie++ di
