Re: [Gluster-users] Performance and redundancy help

2010-02-26 Thread Chad
Ok, using glusterfs-volgen I rebuilt the config files and got the cluster working again. The performance is improved from 1.6 to about 24, NFS is at about 11, and straight to the disks is 170+. There seems to be a HUGE performance loss by using a network file system. I must still be doing somet

Re: [Gluster-users] Performance and redundancy help

2010-02-24 Thread Chad
Ok, I tried to change over to this, but now I just get: [2010-02-24 09:30:41] E [authenticate.c:234:gf_authenticate] auth: no authentication module is interested in accepting remote-client 10.0.0.24:1007 [2010-02-24 09:30:41] E [server-protocol.c:5822:mop_setvolume] tcb_remote: Cannot authentica

Re: [Gluster-users] Performance and redundancy help

2010-02-23 Thread Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
Hello Chad, Am 23.02.2010 15:28, schrieb Chad: > Please forgive my ignorance, but I am not sure I understand about the > client vs server side replication. > > Could someone throw out a quick paragraph describing the 2 and/or a > pro/con list? > If I do client side replication, how to I access th

Re: [Gluster-users] Performance and redundancy help

2010-02-23 Thread Daniel Maher
Chad wrote: Please forgive my ignorance, but I am not sure I understand about the client vs server side replication. Could someone throw out a quick paragraph describing the 2 and/or a pro/con list? If I do client side replication, how to I access the files on the servers? Am I relying on the

Re: [Gluster-users] Performance and redundancy help

2010-02-23 Thread Arvids Godjuks
GlusterFS in contrast to other clustering solutions is a client-side clustering solution. You configure your clients to handle all the distribution, replication and and other available functionality. Client is modifying/reading/creating file and sends commands or the file itself to the storage back

Re: [Gluster-users] Performance and redundancy help

2010-02-23 Thread Chad
Please forgive my ignorance, but I am not sure I understand about the client vs server side replication. Could someone throw out a quick paragraph describing the 2 and/or a pro/con list? If I do client side replication, how to I access the files on the servers? Am I relying on the clients to sy

Re: [Gluster-users] Performance and redundancy help

2010-02-23 Thread Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
Hi Chad, Am 23.02.2010 05:30, schrieb Chad: > I finally got the servers transported 2000 miles, set-up, wired, and > booted. > Here are the vol files. > Just to reiterate, the issues are slow performance on read/write, and > clients hanging when 1 server goes down. Yes, because you do server-side

Re: [Gluster-users] Performance and redundancy help

2010-02-22 Thread Chad
I finally got the servers transported 2000 miles, set-up, wired, and booted. Here are the vol files. Just to reiterate, the issues are slow performance on read/write, and clients hanging when 1 server goes down. ### glusterfs.vol ### # Start tcb_clus

Re: [Gluster-users] Performance and redundancy help

2010-02-15 Thread Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
Hi, Am 16.02.2010 01:58, schrieb Chad: > I am new to glusterfs, and this list, please let me know if I have made > any mistakes in posting this to the list. > I am not sure what your standards are. > > I came across glusterfs last week, it was super easy to set-up and test > and is almost exactly

[Gluster-users] Performance and redundancy help

2010-02-15 Thread Chad
I am new to glusterfs, and this list, please let me know if I have made any mistakes in posting this to the list. I am not sure what your standards are. I came across glusterfs last week, it was super easy to set-up and test and is almost exactly what I want/need. I set up 2 "glusterfs servers"