Hi all,
I'm doing some performance test...
If I test a simple sequential write using dd I get a thorughput of about
550 Mb/s. When I do a sequential write test using sysbench this drops to
about 200. Is this due to the way sysbench tests? Or has in this case the
performance of sysbench itself bec
Hi All,
I build a Gluster 3.8.4 (RHGS 3.2) cluster for a customer, and I am having
some issue demonstrating that it performs well.
The customer compares it with his old NFS based NAS, and runs FIO to test
workloads.
What I notice is that FIO throughtput is only +-20Mb/s, which is not a lot.
When
It could be some extended attributes that still exists on folders brick{1.4},
you could either remove them with attr or simply remove/recreate them.
Cheers,
> On 5 Jan 2017, at 01:23, Zack Boll wrote:
>
> In performance testing a striped 4 volume, I appeared to have crashed
> glusterfs using
Hi Zack,
As the bricks had already been used before, gluster doesn't allow to
create volume with same brick path until you use "force" at the end of
the command. As you are doing performance testing i would recommend to
clean the bricks and issue the same command.
. sudo gluster volume crea
In performance testing a striped 4 volume, I appeared to have crashed
glusterfs using version 3.8.7 on Ubuntu 16.04. I then stopped the volume
and deleted it. I am now having trouble creating a new volume, below is
output
sudo gluster volume create gluster1 transport tcp cyan:/gluster/ssd1/brick
Hello,
I am testing glusterfs to run some VPS using Openvz.
I've been able to improve the performance considerably using the different
translators.
I've been running a simple test. Inside the VPS I have Apache. I am running:
*ab -n 1000 -c 10 http://localhost/index.php*
*
*
index.php is a simpl
