> _GMaster: starting hybrid crawl...
> [2014-05-05 19:11:56.357074] I [master(/data/gluster-poc):1133:crawl]
> _GMaster: processing xsync changelog
> /var/run/gluster/gluster-poc/ssh%3A%2F%2Froot%4010.10.10.120%3Agluster%3A%2F%2F127.0.0.1%3Agluster-poc/5afdd54e66545ea49962eb4d8e257a59/
:gluster-users@gluster.org>"
mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>>
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Question about geo-replication and deletes in 3.5
beta train
I just noticed this, which might be related to the change to xsync?
[root@dev604 eafea2c974a3c29ecfbf48cea274dc23]# more
t...
From: CJ Beck mailto:chris.b...@workday.com>>
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 at 2:50 PM
To: Venky Shankar mailto:yknev.shan...@gmail.com>>
Cc: "gluster-users@gluster.org<mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>"
mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>>
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Q
ril 30, 2014 at 2:50 PM
To: Venky Shankar mailto:yknev.shan...@gmail.com>>
Cc: "gluster-users@gluster.org<mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>"
mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>>
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Question about geo-replication and deletes in 3.5
beta train
I
t;gluster-users@gluster.org<mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>"
mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>>
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Question about geo-replication and deletes in 3.5
beta train
That should not happen. After a replica failover the "now" active node should
continue where
d behavior? If not, then I can open a bug on it.
>
> -CJ
>
> From: Venky Shankar
> Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 at 4:43 PM
>
> To: CJ Beck
> Cc: "gluster-users@gluster.org"
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Question about geo-replication and deletes
> in
il.com>>
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 at 1:54 PM
To: CJ Beck mailto:chris.b...@workday.com>>
Cc: "gluster-users@gluster.org<mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>"
mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>>
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Question about geo-replication and dele
host3.comtest-poc /data/test-poc10.10.1.121::test-poc
> Active N/A Hybrid Crawl10765 70
> 00 0
>
>
> From: Venky Shankar
> Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 at 1:54 PM
> To: CJ Beck
> Cc: "gluste
From: Venky Shankar mailto:yknev.shan...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 at 1:54 PM
To: CJ Beck mailto:chris.b...@workday.com>>
Cc: "gluster-users@gluster.org<mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>"
mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>>
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Questio
"ignore-deletes" is only valid in the initial crawl mode[1] where it does
not propagate deletes to the slave (changelog mode does). Was the session
restarted by any chance?
[1] Geo-replication now has two internal operations modes: a one shot
filesystem crawl mode (used to replicate data already p
I have an issue where deletes are not being propagated to the slave cluster in
a geo-replicated environment. I've looked through the code, and it appears as
though this is something that might have been changed to be hard coded?
When I try to change it via a config option on the command line, it
11 matches
Mail list logo
