2016-07-19 9:23 GMT+02:00 Krutika Dhananjay :
> No. Note that all files and directories under /.shard are like normal files
> and directories to the file-system, it is just
> shard translator that has a special way of interpreting this layout of
> files. What this means is that each file and direct
Please find my response inline:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <
gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2016-07-18 12:25 GMT+02:00 Krutika Dhananjay :
> > Hi,
> >
> > The suggestion you gave was in fact considered at the time of writing
> shard
> > translator.
> > Here
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Krutika Dhananjay
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The suggestion you gave was in fact considered at the time of writing
> shard translator.
> Here are some of the considerations for sticking with a single directory
> as opposed to a two-tier classification of shards based on the
2016-07-18 12:25 GMT+02:00 Krutika Dhananjay :
> Hi,
>
> The suggestion you gave was in fact considered at the time of writing shard
> translator.
> Here are some of the considerations for sticking with a single directory as
> opposed to a two-tier classification of shards based on the initial char
Hi,
The suggestion you gave was in fact considered at the time of writing shard
translator.
Here are some of the considerations for sticking with a single directory as
opposed to a two-tier classification of shards based on the initial chars
of the uuid string:
i) Even for a 4TB disk with the smal
2016-07-18 9:53 GMT+02:00 Oleksandr Natalenko :
> I'd say, like this:
>
> /.shard/d2/18/D218CD1C-4BD9-40D7-9810-86B3F7932509.1
Yes, something like this.
I was on mobile when I wrote. Your suggestion is better than mine.
Probably, using a directory for the whole shard is also better and
keep the d
I'd say, like this:
/.shard/d2/18/D218CD1C-4BD9-40D7-9810-86B3F7932509.1
18.07.2016 10:31, Gandalf Corvotempesta написав:
AFAIK gluster store each shard on a single directory.
With huge files this could lead to millions of small shard file in the
same directory that certainly lead to a performa
AFAIK gluster store each shard on a single directory.
With huge files this could lead to millions of small shard file in the same
directory that certainly lead to a performance issue.
Why not moving each shard in a dedicated directory and may be also with a
defined nested structure? In example, fr
