> To: "Ben Turner" <btur...@redhat.com>
>> > Cc: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhan...@redhat.com>, "gluster-user" <
>> gluster-users@gluster.org>
>> > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 1:40:42 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [G
To: "Ben Turner" <btur...@redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhan...@redhat.com>, "gluster-user" <
> gluster-users@gluster.org>
> > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 1:40:42 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Slow perfo
to hear!
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Abi Askushi" <rightkickt...@gmail.com>
> > To: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhan...@redhat.com>
> > Cc: "gluster-user" <gluster-users@gluster.org>
> > Sent: Friday, September 8, 20
ur...@redhat.com> wrote:
Great to hear!
- Original Message -
> From: "Abi Askushi" <rightkickt...@gmail.com>
> To: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhan...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "gluster-user" <gluster-users@gluster.org>
> Sent: Frida
Great to hear!
- Original Message -
> From: "Abi Askushi" <rightkickt...@gmail.com>
> To: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhan...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "gluster-user" <gluster-users@gluster.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 7:01:00 P
- Original Message -
> From: "Abi Askushi" <rightkickt...@gmail.com>
> To: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhan...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "gluster-user" <gluster-users@gluster.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 5:02:46 AM
> Subject:
Following changes resolved the perf issue:
Added the option
/etc/glusterfs/glusterd.vol :
option rpc-auth-allow-insecure on
restarted glusterd
Then set the volume option:
gluster volume set vms server.allow-insecure on
I am reaching now the max network bandwidth and performance of VMs is quite
I tried to follow step from
https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage to install latest
gluster on the first node.
It installed 3.10 and not 3.11. I am not sure how to install 3.11 without
compiling it.
Then when tried to start the gluster on the node the bricks were reported
down (the
Do you see any improvement with 3.11.1 as that has a patch that improves
perf for this kind of a workload
Also, could you disable eager-lock and check if that helps? I see that max
time is being spent in acquiring locks.
-Krutika
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Abi Askushi
Hi Krutika,
Is it anything in the profile indicating what is causing this bottleneck?
In case i can collect any other info let me know.
Thanx
On Sep 5, 2017 13:27, "Abi Askushi" wrote:
Hi Krutika,
Attached the profile stats. I enabled profiling then ran some dd
Hi Krutika,
Attached the profile stats. I enabled profiling then ran some dd tests.
Also 3 Windows VMs are running on top this volume but did not do any stress
testing on the VMs. I have left the profiling enabled in case more time is
needed for useful stats.
Thanx
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:48
OK my understanding is that with preallocated disks the performance with
and without shard will be the same.
In any case, please attach the volume profile[1], so we can see what else
is slowing things down.
-Krutika
[1] -
Hi Krutika,
I already have a preallocated disk on VM.
Now I am checking performance with dd on the hypervisors which have the
gluster volume configured.
I tried also several values of shard-block-size and I keep getting the same
low values on write performance.
Enabling client-io-threads also
I'm assuming you are using this volume to store vm images, because I see
shard in the options list.
Speaking from shard translator's POV, one thing you can do to improve
performance is to use preallocated images.
This will at least eliminate the need for shard to perform multiple steps
as part of
Hi all,
I have a gluster volume used to host several VMs (managed through oVirt).
The volume is a replica 3 with arbiter and the 3 servers use 1 Gbit network
for the storage.
When testing with dd (dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=1G count=1
oflag=direct) out of the volume (e.g. writing at /root/)
15 matches
Mail list logo