Hi,
Is anyone using GlusterFS on Ubuntu in production? Specifically, I'm looking
at using the NFS portion of it over a bonded interface. I believe I'll get
better speed than user the gluster client across a single interface.
Setup:
3 servers running KVM (about 24 VM's)
2 NAS boxes running
Hi Gerald,
Yes, we are using GlusterFS 3.3.2 with Ubuntu 12.04, KVM and bonding 802.3ad on
2 x 1Gbps nic. This way every tcp session can go over a different nic.
For vmWare vSphere we use the NFS of GlusterFS and for KVM the native glusterfs
client.
This setup is working nice.
Grtz, Jiri
it into the debian unstable packages.
Best,
Josh
- Original Message -
From: Jiri Hoogeveen j.hoogev...@bluebillywig.com
To: Gerald Brandt g...@majentis.com
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org List gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 11:31:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Ubuntu
On 05.12.2013 19:07, Josh Boon wrote:
We're using it in production too. We're on KVM 1.6, gluster 3.4.1
running on Ubuntu 13.04. No problems but do be aware that you'll want
fast links if you actually want to saturate your disk bandwidth. We've
bonded 10gbps links and we still saturate those
@gluster.org List gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 11:31:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Ubuntu GlusterFS in Production
Hi Gerald,
Yes, we are using GlusterFS 3.3.2 with Ubuntu 12.04, KVM and bonding 802.3ad
on 2 x 1Gbps nic. This way every tcp session can go over
I'm running 6x 37TB Gluster nodes in distribute-replicate with
software bonded 10GbE NICs (using Mode 2 balance-xor) per cluster, on
4 clusters (24 nodes all up across 2 sites).
With 10GbE NICs, we don't see much speed boost out of the bonding, but
there's a good per-client latency drop when
packages.
Best,
Josh
- Original Message -
From: Jiri Hoogeveen j.hoogev...@bluebillywig.com
To: Gerald Brandt g...@majentis.com
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org List gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 11:31:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Ubuntu GlusterFS
