On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:30:11 +0100
Marcus Bointon mar...@synchromedia.co.uk wrote:
On 16 Mar 2012, at 00:33, David Coulson wrote:
Is there a FAQ/document somewhere with optimal mkfs and mount
options for ext4 and xfs? Is xfs still the 'desired' filesystem for
gluster bricks?
Something
On 3/16/12 10:30 AM, Marcus Bointon wrote:
On 16 Mar 2012, at 00:33, David Coulson wrote:
Is there a FAQ/document somewhere with optimal mkfs and mount options for ext4
and xfs? Is xfs still the 'desired' filesystem for gluster bricks?
Something that I think would really help gluster is to
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:09:28PM -0500, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
get 50-60 MB/s transfer speeds tops when sending large files ( 2GB)
to gluster. When copying a directory of small files, we get = 1
MB/s performance!
My question is ... is this right? Is this what I should expect from
same - XFS works v well for us too. maybe this is just a stripe issue?
On 15 March 2012 12:49, Fabricio fcann...@gmail.com wrote:
Em 15-03-2012 09:24, Sabuj Pattanayek escreveu:
Striped volumes are unfortunately broken on top of XFS at the moment:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Paul Simpson p...@realisestudio.com wrote:
same - XFS works v well for us too. maybe this is just a stripe issue?
No, it doesn't report the size of sparse files correctly:
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2011-06/msg00225.html
On 03/15/2012 12:09 AM, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
After tweaking settings the best we could, we were able to copy files
from Mac and Win7 desktops across the network but only able to get 50-60
MB/s transfer speeds tops when sending large files ( 2GB) to gluster.
When copying a directory of
On 03/15/2012 09:20 AM, Brian Candler wrote:
I pointed out the problem on the list, and was told that no one strategy can
fit every usage case. This one is particularly tuned to Samba (which writes
128K past the end of the file then back-fills with data). It was suggested
that glusterfsd
One question I have:
In a case where four client nodes need equal read/write access to the
data, is it better to have four Gluster nodes in a replicated
configuration with each mounting the gluster volume locally, or having
TWO Gluster server nodes with the four clients mounting the volume
Is there a FAQ/document somewhere with optimal mkfs and mount options
for ext4 and xfs? Is xfs still the 'desired' filesystem for gluster bricks?
On 3/15/12 3:22 AM, Brian Candler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:09:28PM -0500, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
get 50-60 MB/s transfer speeds tops when
All,
For our project, we bought 8 new Supermicro servers. Each server is a
quad-core Intel cpu with 2U chassis supporting 8 x 7200 RPM Sata drives.
To start out, we only populated 2 x 2TB enterprise drives in each
server and added all 8 peers with their total of 16 drives as bricks to
our
10 matches
Mail list logo
