Our application also stores the path of the file in a database. Accessing
a file directly is normally pretty speedy. However, to get the files into
the database required searching parts of the filesystem which was really
slow. We also had users using the filesystem fixing things which was all
un
On 15 Apr 2014 18:15, Terada Michitaka wrote:
>
> >> To Liam:
>
> >I had about 100 million files in Gluster and it was unbelievably painfully
> >slow. We had to ditch it for other technology.
>
> Has slow down occurred on writing file?, listing files, or both?
>
> In our application, path of th
>> To Liam:
>I had about 100 million files in Gluster and it was unbelievably painfully
slow. We had to ditch it for other technology.
Has slow down occurred on writing file?, listing files, or both?
In our application, path of the data is managed in database.
"ls" is slow, but not influence to
My bug report is here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067256
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 23:51 -0700, Joe Julian wrote:
> If you experience pain using any filesystem, you should see your
> doctor.
>
> If you're not actually experiencing pain, perhaps you should avoid
> hyperbole and inst
If you experience pain using any filesystem, you should see your doctor.
If you're not actually experiencing pain, perhaps you should avoid hyperbole
and instead talk about what version you tried, what your tests were, how you
tried to fix it, and what the results were.
If you're using a curr
We consolidated hardware into a single large ZFS server with a redundant
"hot" slave.
thanks,
liam
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Liam Slusser wrote:
> >
> > I had about 100 million files in Gluster and it was unbelievably
> painful
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Liam Slusser wrote:
>
> I had about 100 million files in Gluster and it was unbelievably painfully
> slow. We had to ditch it for other technology.
>
and what is (or was) that other technology?
-jf
--
He who settles on the idea of the intelligent man as a stati
I had about 100 million files in Gluster and it was unbelievably painfully
slow. We had to ditch it for other technology.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Franco Broi wrote:
>
> I seriously doubt this is the right filesystem for you, we have problems
> listing directories with a few hundred fi
I seriously doubt this is the right filesystem for you, we have problems
listing directories with a few hundred files, never mind millions.
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 10:45 +0900, Terada Michitaka wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I have a problem with slow writing when there are 10 million files.
> (To
Dear All,
I have a problem with slow writing when there are 10 million files.
(Top level directories are 2,500.)
I configured GlusterFS distributed cluster(3 nodes).
Each node's spec is below.
CPU: Xeon E5-2620 (2.00GHz 6 Core)
HDD: SATA 7200rpm 4TB*12 (RAID 6)
NW: 10GBEth
GlusterFS : gluste
10 matches
Mail list logo
