Re: [Gluster-users] architecture suggestions

2018-10-18 Thread Vlad Kopylov
You can experiment with FUSE mount options: halo-latency & halo-min-replicas halo-latency: The threshold below which all other clients will consider children (bricks) connected. halo-min-replicas: The minimum number of replicas which are to be enforced regardless of latency specified in the

Re: [Gluster-users] architecture suggestions

2018-10-16 Thread Oğuz Yarımtepe
Any idea about the Halo configuration? Didn't find any documentation about it. On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 1:10 AM Vlad Kopylov wrote: > if you going for redundancy go for 3 full nodes, arbiter setup seen bugs > doubt anything good will come out of using NFS > if you doing websites use VMs as

Re: [Gluster-users] architecture suggestions

2018-10-16 Thread Vlad Kopylov
if you going for redundancy go for 3 full nodes, arbiter setup seen bugs doubt anything good will come out of using NFS if you doing websites use VMs as hypervisors are using libgfapi or implement libgfapi in your app directly v On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 2:13 PM Oğuz Yarımtepe wrote: > Hi, >

[Gluster-users] architecture suggestions

2018-10-14 Thread Oğuz Yarımtepe
Hi, I am trying to replicate nfs mount areas between to sites that will work active active. I was checking the methods that i can use via GlusterFS and it seems replication should be the way. I am not sure how many nodes should i use fo replication. I may need to make maintenance on the GlusterFS