>> >
>> >
>> > From: "Alastair Neil" mailto:ajneil.t...@gmail.com>
<mailto:ajneil.t...@gmail.com <mailto:ajneil.t...@gmail.com>>>
>> > To: "gluster-us
>> >
>> >> > 8+2 and 8+3 configurations are not the limitation but just
>> suggestions.
>> >> > You can create 16+3 volume without any issue.
>> >> >
>> >> > Ashish
>> >> >
>>
other then
>> >>> >> heal
>> >>> >> speed.
>> >>> >> I tested heal speed with 8+2 and 16+4 on 3.9.0 and see that heals
>> >>> >> on
>> >>> >> 8+2 is faster by 2x.
>> >>> >
>>
>> >
>> > From: "Alastair Neil" mailto:ajneil.t...@gmail.com>>
>> > To: "gluster-users" mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org>>
>> > Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 2:23:32 AM
>> > Subject: [
>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > As you increase number of nodes that are participating in an EC set
> >>> > number
> >>> > of parallel heals increase. Is the heal speed you saw improved per
> file
> >>> > or
> >>&g
gt;> >>> >> 8+2 is faster by 2x.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > As you increase number of nodes that are participating in an EC set
>> >>> > number
>> >>> > of parallel heals increase
; >>> > As you increase number of nodes that are participating in an EC set
> >>> > number
> >>> > of parallel heals increase. Is the heal speed you saw improved per
> file
> >>> > or
> >>> > the over all time it took to heal the data?
> >>> >
> >>> >>
> >
;> >>
>>> >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Ashish Pandey
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > 8+2 and 8+3 configurations are not the limitation but just
>>> >> > suggestions.
>>> >> > You c
gt;> >> > 8+2 and 8+3 configurations are not the limitation but just
>> suggestions.
>> >> > You can create 16+3 volume without any issue.
>> >> >
>> >> > Ashish
>> >> >
>> >> > __
8+3 configurations are not the limitation but just
> suggestions.
> >> > You can create 16+3 volume without any issue.
> >> >
> >> > Ashish
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: "Alastair Neil"
&
the limitation but just suggestions.
>> > You can create 16+3 volume without any issue.
>> >
>> > Ashish
>> >
>> > ____________
>> > From: "Alastair Neil"
>> > To: "gluster-users"
>> > Sent: Friday, May 5,
2 and 8+3 configurations are not the limitation but just suggestions.
> > You can create 16+3 volume without any issue.
> >
> > Ashish
> >
> >
> > From: "Alastair Neil"
> > To: "gluster-users"
> >
nd 8+3 configurations are not the limitation but just suggestions.
> You can create 16+3 volume without any issue.
>
> Ashish
>
>
> From: "Alastair Neil"
> To: "gluster-users"
> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 2:23:32 AM
>
8+2 and 8+3 configurations are not the limitation but just suggestions.
You can create 16+3 volume without any issue.
Ashish
- Original Message -
From: "Alastair Neil"
To: "gluster-users"
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 2:23:32 AM
Subject: [Gluster-users] disperse
Hi
we are deploying a large (24node/45brick) cluster and noted that the RHES
guidelines limit the number of data bricks in a disperse set to 8. Is
there any reason for this. I am aware that you want this to be a power of
2, but as we have a large number of nodes we were planning on going with
16
15 matches
Mail list logo
