of data to be healed which will require reading
> from 4
> > disk only.
> >
> > I am keeping Pranith in CC to take his input too.
> >
> > Ashish
> >
> >
> >
> > From: "Serkan Çoban"
> > To: "
> From: "Serkan Çoban"
> To: "Ashish Pandey"
> Cc: "Gluster Users"
> Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 4:47:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] ec heal questions
>
>
> Is reading the good copies to construct the bad
.
Ashish
- Original Message -
From: "Serkan Çoban"
To: "Ashish Pandey"
Cc: "Gluster Users"
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 4:47:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] ec heal questions
Is reading the good copies to construct the bad chunk is a parallel or
s
__
> From: "Serkan Çoban"
> To: "Gluster Users"
> Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 4:02:22 PM
> Subject: [Gluster-users] ec heal questions
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Assume we have 8+2 and 16+4 ec configurations and we just replaced a
> broken disk
Çoban"
To: "Gluster Users"
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 4:02:22 PM
Subject: [Gluster-users] ec heal questions
Hi,
Assume we have 8+2 and 16+4 ec configurations and we just replaced a
broken disk in each configuration which has 100GB of data. In which
case heal completes fas
Hi,
Assume we have 8+2 and 16+4 ec configurations and we just replaced a
broken disk in each configuration which has 100GB of data. In which
case heal completes faster? Does heal speed has anything related with
ec configuration?
Assume we are in 16+4 ec configuration. When heal starts it reads 1
