Yes, it is compatible.
On March 19, 2014 4:59:44 AM PDT, "姜路" wrote:
>hi
>now i Upgraded the gluster from 3.3.0 to 3.4.2,but i found one
>question..:
>the Phenomenon is when i create a new volume , it works well ,but my
>volumes create at version 3.3.0 doesn't work
>they can by seen at mount poin
hi
now i Upgraded the gluster from 3.3.0 to 3.4.2,but i found one question..:
the Phenomenon is when i create a new volume , it works well ,but my volumes
create at version 3.3.0 doesn't work
they can by seen at mount point but the date in them couldn't be read
does Upgrading cann't Compatible to
Same here,
Had ext4 in production with distributed replicated setup and after
adding 3rd set of replicas (1x1) things went really really bad.. This
was with 2.6.32.xxx kernel and Gluster 3.2.5
Had to rebuild with XFS and upgraded Gluster to 3.4.2 yesterday and all
seems good so far..
v
On Tue 1
Ok...
>From previous posts, there still seems to be a kernel but, unaddressed by
developers, which affects how ext4 works, and indeed makes its use with
gluster unreliable. Specially on older versions of GLuster.
Upgrading to 3.4.2 would be nice, if you can.
If at all possible, use xfs instead o
jianglulu
hello everyone,when i write the data in the server which used
2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64 kernel and gluster3.3.0 ,the server occur
"ext4_mb_complex_scan_group: 27 free blocks as per group info. But bitmap says
0 " error and then kernel panic,so i want to ask some suggests for this:
1.is
