Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 12:51:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] linux raid0 vs gluster raid0
Hardware being best, what's better between software and gluster?
On 9/23/2010 10:55 PM, Craig Carl wrote:
Jeremy -
The absolute best would be hardwa
fs-in-production/
*From: *"Jeremy Enos"
*To: *gluster-us...@gluster.org
*Sent: *Thursday, September 23, 2010 12:13:25 PM
*Subject: *[Gluster-users] linux raid0 vs gluster raid0
Suppose I've got 5 disks in a system connected to my IB networ
fs-in-production/
*From: *"Jeremy Enos"
*To: *gluster-us...@gluster.org
*Sent: *Thursday, September 23, 2010 12:13:25 PM
*Subject: *[Gluster-users] linux raid0 vs gluster raid0
Suppose I've got 5 disks in a system connected to my I
l.com
Twitter - @gluster
Installing Gluster Storage Platform, the movie!
http://rackerhacker.com/2010/08/11/one-month-with-glusterfs-in-production/
From: "Jeremy Enos"
To: gluster-users@gluster.org
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 12:13:25 PM
Subject: [Gluster-users] linux raid0 v
Suppose I've got 5 disks in a system connected to my IB network, and I
want to host a Gluster filesystem on it for max I/O (large block,
multiple client).
Should I raid0 the 5 disks at the linux level, or the gluster level?
thx-
Jeremy
___
Glus
