sorry,I read you patch( http://review.gluster.org/14911),that fix the
problem.Thanks very much.
2016-11-16 22:38 GMT+08:00 jin deng :
>
>
> 2016-11-16 22:30 GMT+08:00 Soumya Koduri :
>
>>
>>
>> On 11/16/2016 07:38 PM, jin deng wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you
On 11/16/2016 07:38 PM, jin deng wrote:
Thank you so much.Soumya,you make me more clear about the logic of the code.
I used to wonder the code was to handle the last resolve case.However i
followed
the "nfs3_fh_resolve_entry_hard" and I thought it would get the ret ==
-2 case and went
into
2016-11-16 22:30 GMT+08:00 Soumya Koduri :
>
>
> On 11/16/2016 07:38 PM, jin deng wrote:
>
>> Thank you so much.Soumya,you make me more clear about the logic of the
>> code.
>>
>> I used to wonder the code was to handle the last resolve case.However i
>> followed
>>
>> the
Thank you so much.Soumya,you make me more clear about the logic of the code.
I used to wonder the code was to handle the last resolve case.However i
followed
the "nfs3_fh_resolve_entry_hard" and I thought it would get the ret == -2
case and went
into the "nfs3_lookup_op" branch,and finally call
On 11/16/2016 06:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Added people who know nfs code.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:21 PM, jin deng > wrote:
Hi all,
I'm reading the code of 3.6.9 version and got a question.And I'm
not very
Added people who know nfs code.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:21 PM, jin deng wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm reading the code of 3.6.9 version and got a question.And I'm not
> very familiar with the code,so I have to confirm it(I checked the master
> branch,it's same with
Hi all,
I'm reading the code of 3.6.9 version and got a question.And I'm not
very familiar with the code,so I have to confirm it(I checked the master
branch,it's same with 3.6.9).
The question is about the 'lookup' operation of NFS.And i'm with this
code flow:
nfs3_lookup (nfs3.c)