Torbjörn Granlund writes:
> This is not the same bug as we worked around for register-to-register
> copying on x86-32 some years ago. It is not cleer what syntax this
> assembler might accept, and which also gives the right instruction (here
> and on non-prolematic hosts).
For reference, in net
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
So would be useful to try if replacement movq --> movd
(i) solves the problem on (older) macos, and
(ii) produces identical object code on systems with more up-to-date
assemblers.
Note that the movq instances the old assembler complains about
Torbjörn Granlund writes:
> Note that the movq instances the old assembler complains about here read
> from memory. Using movd might yield surprises there.
Hmm, it wasn't clear to me fromt he error report exactly which
instructions it was complaining about, so I guessed this was one of
them:
h
Am 02.11.2022 um 08:58 schrieb Niels Möller:
Torbjörn Granlund writes:
This is not the same bug as we worked around for register-to-register
copying on x86-32 some years ago. It is not cleer what syntax this
assembler might accept, and which also gives the right instruction (here
and on non-
I seem to have misread the report. I thought the
movq mem,xmm
instructions were the problem.
I pushed a fix to the repo. Please try it.
--
Torbjörn
Please encrypt, key id 0xC8601622
___
gmp-bugs mailing list
gmp-bugs@gmplib.org
https://gmplib.or
Am 02.11.2022 um 13:59 schrieb Torbjörn Granlund:
I seem to have misread the report. I thought the
movq mem,xmm
instructions were the problem.
Good that this got clearer.
I pushed a fix to the repo. Please try it.
https://gmplib.org/repo/gmp/rev/3ac5afa36be5 works fine for me on core
