Re: [MPFR] MPFR and mini-gmp

2012-01-09 Thread Torbjorn Granlund
I agree with Torbjorn. For base 256 conversion, the function mpz_getnth_ui he proposes is far better than the current mpz_getlimbn, because of the possible internal use of nails... But for base-256 conversion, mpz_export is perfect. -- Torbjörn ___

Re: [MPFR] MPFR and mini-gmp

2012-01-09 Thread Zimmermann Paul
Hi Niels, Torbjörn, Marco, > I agree with Torbjorn. For base 256 conversion, the function mpz_getnth_ui > he proposes is far better than the current mpz_getlimbn, because of the > possible internal use of nails... since that discussion has no longer to do with mpfr, please follow-up to gmp

Re: [MPFR] MPFR and mini-gmp

2012-01-09 Thread bodrato
Ciao Niels! Happy new year! :-) Il Lun, 9 Gennaio 2012 4:02 pm, Niels Möller ha scritto: > Torbjorn Granlund writes: > >> I'd like to deprecate mpz_getlimbn i favour of (a planned) >> mpz_getnth_ui, since I'd like to get rid of the limb abstraction of any >> public high level interfaces. > > In

Re: [MPFR] MPFR and mini-gmp

2012-01-09 Thread Niels Möller
[ Adding the gmp-devel list. ] Torbjorn Granlund writes: > I'd like to deprecate mpz_getlimbn i favour of (a planned) > mpz_getnth_ui, since I'd like to get rid of the limb abstraction of any > public high level interfaces. In nettle, I use mpz_getlimbn for conversion to base 256 (and that's wh