Daniel Lichtblau wrote:
That said, I confess I am not sure there is much need for this outside
of subquadratic gcd code. If it is not more generally useful, then I
guess this automation would only be of benefit to a limited set of
users. (Like, maybe four of us.)
Years ago I published a
Daniel Lichtblau d...@wolfram.com writes:
If you do not manage to locate them I can scan and send a pdf. (Least
I can do for someone who shared a room for two months with that
Torbjörn fellow..)
I started to write a reply, but decided against sending it after I read
this unprovoked
On 06/14/2013 02:27 PM, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
Daniel Lichtblaud...@wolfram.com writes:
If you do not manage to locate them I can scan and send a pdf. (Least
I can do for someone who shared a room for two months with that
Torbjörn fellow..)
I started to write a reply, but decided
On 06/14/2013 12:02 PM, Philip McLaughlin wrote:
Daniel Lichtblau wrote:
That said, I confess I am not sure there is much need for this outside
of subquadratic gcd code. If it is not more generally useful, then I
guess this automation would only be of benefit to a limited set of
users.
Daniel Lichtblau d...@wolfram.com writes:
I simply have no idea why you would choose to take such offense. If it
serves any purpose, it is one I quite fail to see. That said, I'll not
trouble you with further communication.
If you cannot assume a professional attitude on the GMP lists,
