Re: udiv_qr_3by2 vs divappr

2018-08-30 Thread Niels Möller
paul zimmermann writes: > page 1: there is an extra ')' in the footnote Fixed. > page 3: can you detail the proof of R_{bignum} < D? If the algorithm would > also take as input u_{-1} as in your 2011 paper, I am ok, but here I am not > sure. Good catch. I did look at these requirements in some

Re: udiv_qr_3by2 vs divappr

2018-08-30 Thread paul zimmermann
Dear Niels, > I've updated the paper (same location, > https://www.lysator.liu.se/~nisse/misc/schoolbook-divappr.pdf). page 1: there is an extra ')' in the footnote page 3: can you detail the proof of R_{bignum} < D? If the algorithm would also take as input u_{-1} as in your 2011 paper,