Daniel Lichtblau wrote: > That said, I confess I am not sure there is much need for this outside > of subquadratic gcd code. If it is not more generally useful, then I > guess this automation would only be of benefit to a limited set of > users. (Like, maybe four of us.)
Years ago I published a paper in Math. Comp. which showed (Variation 2.) how to use both cyclic and negacyclic transforms in the context of Montgomery multiplication. The re-use of forward transforms, for example in powering algoorithms, was specifically mentioned. See http://www.ams.org/journals/mcom/2004-73-246/S0025-5718-03-01543-6/S0025-5718-03-01543-6.pdf Unfortunately I've never had the time to actually implement the method so I don't know how useful it might be in practice. Regards, Phil McLaughlin _______________________________________________ gmp-devel mailing list gmp-devel@gmplib.org http://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-devel
