On 2014-01-03 12:19:26 +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net writes:
Note that if you want to care of non-two's-complement
implementations, you should write:
Isn't the notion of 2's complement restricted to signed
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014, Niels Möller wrote:
Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr writes:
I'll also push a patch handling the fact that the standard SHRT_MAX
and others don't have type short but int.
Can you explain what the problem is? I noticed this change,
--- a/gmp-h.in Thu Jan 02 12:28:21
Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr writes:
So, do you agree with the change?
Yes. I don't understand why the C spec doesn't define USHORT_MAX the way
it does, but we should nevertheless define our constant in the same way
as C's USHORT_MAX.
(care to add a suitable comment?)
I think the comment
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr writes:
I couldn't find anything other than the -mcpu=ultrasparc ABI=32 issue
with gcc-2.9x around 1999-2000.
I haven't looked deeply into this issue, but to me it seems strange that
we define INT_MAX etc
Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr writes:
Then I am considering pushing the attached patch soon.
Do we really need a configure test? Which C compilers lack limits.h?
Regards,
/Niels
--
Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26.
Internet email is subject to wholesale
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013, Niels Möller wrote:
Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr writes:
Then I am considering pushing the attached patch soon.
Do we really need a configure test?
No idea. It seemed safer, and since we already have fallback code...
On the other hand, mini-gmp seems happy enough
by including limits.h in gmp-impl.h,
but I see this comment:
/* limits.h is not used in general, since it's an ANSI-ism, and since on
solaris gcc 2.95 under -mcpu=ultrasparc in ABI=32 ends up getting wrong
values (the ABI=64 values).
On Cray vector systems, however, we need the system
Oups, looks like I already asked about that:
https://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-bugs/2011-November/002443.html
and the reply was to try including tests.h before gmp-impl.h.
--
Marc Glisse
___
gmp-devel mailing list
gmp-devel@gmplib.org
Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net writes:
On 2013-12-25 12:13:39 +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
Oups, looks like I already asked about that:
https://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-bugs/2011-November/002443.html
and the reply was to try including tests.h before gmp-impl.h.
I'd say
On 2013-12-25 13:28:20 +0100, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
IIRC, limits.h was unreliable for many years, and our workarounds
allowed GMP to work on more systems.
I've tried to find something about that on Google, but couldn't
find anything. Any reference?
--
Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net -
Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net writes:
I've tried to find something about that on Google, but couldn't
find anything. Any reference?
Perhaps ChangeLog has some history.
Torbjörn
___
gmp-devel mailing list
gmp-devel@gmplib.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
