ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
Question is, when is it useful for our purposes? First example,
mpn_sec_add_1:
mp_limb_t
mpn_sec_add_1 (mp_limb_t *rp, mp_limb_t *ap, mp_size_t n, mp_limb_t b,
mp_ptr scratch)
{
scratch[0] = b;
MPN_ZERO
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Niels Möller wrote:
Torbjorn Granlund t...@gmplib.org writes:
The volatile qualifier makes sure the number of memory reads and memory
writes remain unchanged from the source code.
Question is, when is it useful for our purposes? First example,
mpn_sec_add_1:
mp_limb_t
bodr...@mail.dm.unipi.it writes:
Ciao,
Il Mar, 7 Gennaio 2014 4:58 pm, Niels Möller ha scritto:
Here's a first patch adding a couple of other functions. Benchmarking
and testing is missing (except that the sec_minvert tests still pass).
Interesting...
Another thing I was about to ask, but
Torbjorn Granlund t...@gmplib.org writes:
* Make some other sec functions from Niels' list public?
Here's a first patch adding a couple of other functions. Benchmarking
and testing is missing (except that the sec_minvert tests still pass).
One interface question: Return value of cnd_neg.
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
Torbjorn Granlund t...@gmplib.org writes:
* Make some other sec functions from Niels' list public?
Here's a first patch adding a couple of other functions. Benchmarking
and testing is missing (except that the sec_minvert tests still
