Re: speed of mpn_sqrtrem vs mpn_rootrem

2015-07-31 Thread paul zimmermann
Ciao Marco, Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:21:40 +0200 From: Marco Bodrato bodr...@mail.dm.unipi.it Ciao Paul, Il Mer, 22 Gennaio 2014 1:00 pm, Zimmermann Paul ha scritto: tarte% ./speed -s 1000,3000,1 -r mpn_sqrtrem mpn_rootrem.2 overhead 0.2 secs, precision 1 units

Re: speed of mpn_sqrtrem vs mpn_rootrem

2015-07-30 Thread Marco Bodrato
Ciao Paul, Il Mer, 22 Gennaio 2014 1:00 pm, Zimmermann Paul ha scritto: tarte% ./speed -s 1000,3000,1 -r mpn_sqrtrem mpn_rootrem.2 overhead 0.2 secs, precision 1 units of 3.53e-10 secs, CPU freq 2833.00 MHz mpn_sqrtrem mpn_rootrem.2 1000 0.000153504

speed of mpn_sqrtrem vs mpn_rootrem

2014-01-22 Thread Zimmermann Paul
Hi, the issue reported in September 2010 is still present: https://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-devel/2010-September/001654.html tarte% ./speed -s 1000,3000,1 -r mpn_sqrtrem mpn_rootrem.2 overhead 0.2 secs, precision 1 units of 3.53e-10 secs, CPU freq 2833.00 MHz

Re: speed of mpn_sqrtrem vs mpn_rootrem

2014-01-22 Thread Torbjorn Granlund
Zimmermann Paul paul.zimmerm...@inria.fr writes: the issue reported in September 2010 is still present: Such things happens sometimes. It means that we volunteers did not have enough spare time for making the GMP gift better in that specific respect. Torbjörn Please encrypt, key id

Re: speed of mpn_sqrtrem vs mpn_rootrem

2014-01-22 Thread Zimmermann Paul
the issue reported in September 2010 is still present: Such things happens sometimes. It means that we volunteers did not have enough spare time for making the GMP gift better in that specific respect. there was no criticism in my mail (sorry if it seemed), I just wanted to put this