Ha, ha:) I tried that, but failed, for the time being:) I only have the
examples distributed with MED library to provide inspiration; That was the
code:
std::vector conn;
for (i = 0; i < num; i ++)
{
conn.push_back(i);
}
ASSERT (MEDmeshElementConnectivityWr(fid, meshName, MED_NO_DT,
Hi Juan - Indeed, Gmsh does not guarantee that the Delaunay criterion is
satisfied.
Christophe
> On 3 May 2018, at 22:00, Juan Sanchez wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know how to get gmsh to output a mesh, where all
> tetrahedra meet the Delaunay condition of
Gmsh displays all meshes and post-processing data based on elements: so indeed
you will need to add "point elements" (1 point for each vertex) in the med file
in order to visualize it.
Christophe
> On 17 May 2018, at 14:56, Tomasz Koziara wrote:
>
> Dear Christophe,
>
> On 17 May 2018, at 18:31, swarsi wrote:
>
> thank you for your response. what i did was to read and STL file into GMSH
> and then i used the Recombine 2D with default option of Blossom but i got a
> quad dominant mesh with approximately 15-20% triangles. should this not
thank you for your response. what i did was to read and STL file into GMSH
and then i used the Recombine 2D with default option of Blossom but i got a
quad dominant mesh with approximately 15-20% triangles. should this not
have given the same results as the paper that was linked above?
thanks
On
Dear Christophe,
Here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ve8rm3qjyvew1uq/spring_system0rb.med.gz?dl=0
Best regards,
Tomek
On 17 May 2018 at 08:50, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
>
> Can you send a (small) example file?
>
> On 14 May 2018, at 13:08, Tomasz Koziara
On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 08:46 +0200, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> How could I get point coordinates at python api?
> gmsh.model.getBoundingBox(0, point_tag)
Is there any way to get the center of gravity of a volume or surface?
--
jeremy
www.seamplex.com
Hi,
Just in case, don't forget to check the options...
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Options
...To reset all options to their default values, use the ‘Restore default options’ button in
‘Tools->Options->General->Advanced’, or erase the General.SessionFileName and
Dear all,
I am trying to use gmsh to mesh with hexaedra two volumes separated by a
smooth non-flat interface. The entire volume is a cube.
After many tries, I identified a meshing strategy but the results is not
good enough.
Is there a preferred strategy for the choice of a 2D and 3D
Thank you for your response. But that is quite unexpected, since the normal
vectors define the volume. So my question is, how can I make all the normal
vectors point outward the volume? I am working with boundary element method
and the normal vector orientation is really important to the method.
With the default algorithm evrything looks ok to me (don't use -algo front3d
unless you really have to).
> On 9 May 2018, at 17:12, Harris FAROOQ
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to get a uniform element size throughout the geometry. I have
> tried
Use the latest snapshot: it fixes many small issues with the OpenCASCADE
kernel, including setting of mesh sizes.
Christophe
> On 10 May 2018, at 00:23, Leonardo Roncetti wrote:
>
> I get a strange result when trying to mesh surfaces created with lines and
>
> On 15 May 2018, at 18:22, swarsi wrote:
>
> is the meshGFaceQuadrilateralize.cpp a complete implementation of the qmorph
> algorithm?
We currently don't use that implementation: I advise you use our own
recombination strategy instead
> On 16 May 2018, at 22:26, Roman Butov wrote:
>
> How could I get point coordinates at python api?
gmsh.model.getBoundingBox(0, point_tag)
> Best regards, Roman
>
> ___
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh@onelab.info
>
14 matches
Mail list logo