(.msh) file , and we can directly get the physical Ids from
> > the DMPlex object?
>
> I have no idea... PETSc/DMPlex reads .msh files?
>
Yes indeed. Here's the implementation:
https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/blob/master/src/dm/impls/plex/plexgmsh.c
Thank you
--
jeremy thel
If you do not need curved elements set
Mesh.SecondOrderLinear = 1
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, 11:22 Stephen Wornom wrote:
> Tell the list if it removes the negative values.
> Thanks,
> Stephen
>
> - Original Message -
> > From:
ng'...
> Error : Creating './test.png' requires a graphical interface
> context
Add an Exit instruction in the .geo and call it without the '-'
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
What does "I cannot create it online" mean?
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 10:19 +0200, Zuheyr Alsalihi wrote:
> Thank you so much!!
>
> I am using a geo file with which I can create a png file using the
> display but I cannot create
> it
> Using the coherence command I get a large list of errors of the type:
>
> Error : could not find extruded vertex (0.08443279255020152,
> -0.053826794978966, 0).
Try to re-use line 18 for the last extrude instead of creating a new
edge 35.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
I am not sure because I seldom use the GUI. But what I am pretty sure of is
that Gmsh works the way it should.
It would help to know what the actual errors you get are.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020, 07:25 Bart Deschoolmeester <
bart.deschoolmees...@bbri.be>
Sure, the Coherence command performs a Boolean Fragments operation and
the ids of the entities are modified.Just set the appropiate id of the
new entities in the EdgesList of your field:
Field[1].EdgesList = {25,26};
Regards--jeremy thelerwww.seamplex.com
On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 13:41 +, Bart Des
Add
Coherence;
and you'll be fine.
On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 10:43 +, Bart Deschoolmeester wrote:
> Hi,
> I am a beginner.
> While working on a larger 3D project I noticed some gaps and
> overlaps.
> I plan to simulate the heat transfer.
> I assume gaps and overlaps are to be avoided to get a good
It works if you use a smaller radius, say 0.075
--jeremy thelerwww.seamplex.com id="-x-evo-selection-start-marker">
On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 18:35 +, Kadry Abdelmeguid Karim Hesham Ahmed
wrote:
>
>
> Great Idea, please find a simple .geo case that reproduces the
> problem below:
>
>
>
>
> Se
RT(F)M, section F.5 question 3 in
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Mesh-module-questions
How can I only save tetrahedral elements (not triangles and lines)?
By default, if physical groups are defined, the output mesh only
contains those elements that belong to physical entities. So to save
Defining physical groups or not control what is saved in the .msh file not
what is shown in the GUI.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020, 04:40 Keith Sloan wrote:
> I am new to Gmsh and trying to reproduce the following but still seeing
> triangles on the surface.
>
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#t10_002egeo
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Sun, May 31, 2020, 03:56 Tian Xia wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> Thanks for directing me to the documentation. I can see my first
> question answered there. But I still can't see a clear way
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Specifying-mesh-element-sizes
On Sat, 2020-05-30 at 00:21 -0700, Tian Xia wrote:
> Hi Gmsh developers,
> Thank you for developing this extremely useful tool. Recently I have
> encountered a couple of problems about generating 3D non-uniform
> mesh:
>
> 1. If
Dear Nicolas
I asked the very same thing here:
https://gitlab.onelab.info/gmsh/gmsh/-/issues/450The answer is here:
https://gitlab.onelab.info/gmsh/gmsh/-/issues/644
TLDR; perform a boolean fragments operation between the line and the
point:
SetFactory("OpenCASCADE");
Point(1) = {0,0,0, 0.1};
Poi
an animation that shows the real
time advancement?
Python and linear interpolation between the two closest sets of data
are fine. I would like to get the general idea, I can work out the
details.
Regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh
On Thu, 2020-03-19 at 13:02 +0100, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> In a .geo file:
>
> Merge "file.msh";
> SetOrder 2;
> Save "file2.msh";
Great! I was close, but it is always wise to ask the boss.
Thanks.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
_
Yes, but the difficult part here is to know if a new node needs to be added
or another element already added it, and in such case what is the
already-added node id.
Maybe Gmsh already has this somewhere near the "refine by splitting" tool.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Thu, Ma
Any ideas?
Regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
No, the problem is that Gmsh does import the volume but after it you
ask it to perform either one or more of the OCC "healing" procedures and for
some reason these procedures remove the volume.
See if you have something like
Geometry.OCCFixDegenerated
Geometry.OCCFixSmallEdges
Geometry.OCCFixSma
the bigger one. This is the code:
>
>
>
>
>
> Sphere(1) = {0, 0, 0, 1, -Pi/2, Pi/2, 2*Pi};
>
> Sphere(2) = {0, 0, 0, 3, -Pi/2, Pi/2, 2*Pi};
>
>
>
> BooleanDifference{ Volume{2}; Delete; }{ Volume{1}; Delete; }
This actually works. See attached png.
https://dev.opencascade.org/doc/overview/html/occt_user_guides__boolean_operations.html
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 19:01 tao song wrote:
> Dear Christophe,
> It's really solved my problem, and i'm looking forward to the new
> algorithm!
> Is
delx = 0.5;
xend = 20;
Point(1) = {0, 0, 0, delx};
Point(2) = {xend, 0, 0, delx};
Line(1) = {1, 2};
Physical Point("left") = {1};
Physical Point("right") = {2};
Physical Line("bulk") = {1};
On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 23:11 +0530, Deepa wrote:
> >
> > I am a beginner here.
> >
> > I'm looking for wa
When were physical entities renamed to groups?
Is the official nomenclature “Physical group” now?
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
For linear transformations (and non-linear too if you are flexible enough)
you could write a python script to read all the nodes coordinates,
transform them algebraically and then write them back into a .msh file.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020, 22:49 Max Orok wrote
openfoam should do that too.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019, 18:53 Marc Belleau wrote:
>
> Hi to all
>
> I have to use version 2.12.0 in order for gmshToFoam to transform the
> physical groups into patches. Because if I use version 4.3.0 and save
>
eferences to how the different optimization
methods work?
Regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
Hi
Is there a way to get a string with the OCE/OCCT version the Python
Gmsh SDK was linked against?
So far I could only get it by grepping `gmsh -info` for OCC but I would
like to know the version after importing gmsh in a python script.
Regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
Have you tried FacesList instead of EdgesList?
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 15:52 +0100, Sabrina Zacarias wrote:
> Dear gmsh team,
>
> I Have a surface (which is a tube) embedded in a volume (a cylinder),
> and I have two questions regarding the meshing:
>
> 1. Is it possible/is there an easy way to de
ersions used by Gmsh
> > under different OS (I see version 7.3.0 under Linux, and 7.3.1
> > under Win).
> >
> > A.
> >
> >
> >
> > Da: Peter Johnston
> > Inviato: venerdì 6 settembre 2019 08:54
> > A: Jeremy Theler ; g...@geuz.org; Al
Indeed, see attached png.I am using latest Git linked against OCE 7.3.0
in GNU/Linux.
On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 08:13 +, Alessandro Vicini wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> I’m using 4.4.0 (under windows), and your script seems to work for
> me…
>
> A.
>
>
>
> Da: gmsh
> Per conto di Peter Johnsto
If anyone is interested, that very same case can be solved
directly from Onshape in less than 30 seconds:
https://youtu.be/iure4rn6GRg
In a couple of weeks I will add the possibility to download the .step
and .geo to modify it offline.
Regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon, 2019-07
Hi Alessandro
I am not sure what happens in your case but I have seen different numbering
of entities when using OCE 6.9.1 and OCCT 7.x, even under the same OS.
You might want to check you are using the same kernel.
Regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019, 09:46
another;
> > the elements in one component are not connected to the elements in
> > another.
> >
>
> You need to fuse the two surfaces: this can be achieved with the
> "fragment" operation - see attached file.
Would there be any diffe
Read further an use Distance + Threshold fields.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
Browse
https://bitbucket.org/seamplex/wasora/src/9edef2db1f04bdb49e604722dce8df18879709b1/src/mesh/?at=master
and look for the routines that compute the volumes, like line 405 of
the following file
https://bitbucket.org/seamplex/wasora/src/9edef2db1f04bdb49e604722dce8df18879709b1/src/mesh/tet4.c?at
}
> for i in range(0, len(faces), 3):
> f = tuple(sorted(faces[i:i+3]))
> t = tets[i/12]
> if not t in txt:
> txt[t] = set()
> for tt in fxt[f]:
> if tt != t:
> txt[t].add(tt)
>
> print("neighbors by face: ", txt)
>
&g
Hey Yuri
I asked the same question back in 2011:
http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/2011/006878.html
All I got is a loose reference to Lohner's book:
http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/2011/006881.html
Someone asked it again in 2012 with no response:
http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/2012/007480.html
http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/2019/012933.html
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#index-Geometry_002eOCCTargetUnit
On Sat, 2019-03-30 at 20:22 +1300, Victor Kemp wrote:
> How does Gmsh decide what units to use for its dimensionless mesh
> made from a STEP file? I've noticed that different
gards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
SetFactory("OpenCASCADE");
a() = ShapeFromFile("cube.brep");
DBRep_DrawableShape
CASCADE Topology V1, (c) Matra-Datavision
Locations 1
1
1 0 0 0
0
what about Shepard or Modified Shepard?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_distance_weighting id="-x-evo-
selection-start-marker">
On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 12:00 +0100, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> > On 18 Feb 2019, at 16:36, Alessandro Vicini > el.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I was wondering whethe
, it could. This is why I am interested in this issue, and raised
the question on how to average if the solver has to output nodal values
of stresses. Weighted average? With the element's volume? With the
element's quality?
[1] https://www.seamplex.com/blog/say-modeling-not-simulation.html
--
average? weighted average? how? using the element's volume? the
element's quality? etc
regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com$MeshFormat
2.2 0 8
$EndMeshFormat
$Nodes
6
1 0 0 0
2 1 0 0
3 1 1 0
4 0 1 0
5 2 0 0
6 2 1 0
$EndNodes
$Elements
2
1 3 2 1 1 1 2 3 4
2 3 2 1 1 2 5 6 3
$En
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
> _______
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh@onelab.info
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
--
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
> coarse everywhere else.
>
> The reason I am not doing this manually is because I have 1000+ .iges
> files to mesh due to the scope of my project.
>
> any help would be greatly appreciated!
> Thanks,
> Terrence
>
> ___
> g
Hi all
I see in contrib/HighOrderMeshOptimizer/OptHomRun.cpp:686 that if the
higher-order optimizer cannot make all the jacobian non-negative, then
an error is raised.
Why is this a hard error and not a warning? I have seen cases where the
optimizer cannot make all of then non-negative, yet the r
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 06:52 +0200, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> If you link with the static gmsh lib you'll also need to specify all
> the additional dependencies.
>
> If you have trouble compiling/linking, I would suggest downloading
> the binary gmsh SDK from the website - we distribute it exac
That is how boundary conditions are set in the web-based interface
www.caeplex.com
Try uploading your CAD model and creating a dummy project. From step #2
you can download the mesh in .msh format (although 2.2 only for now).
On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 04:27 +, Wesley Ranger wrote:
> Hello everyon
On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 19:58 +0200, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> > On 14 Sep 2018, at 04:43, jeremy theler
> > wrote:
> >
> > Dear developers,
> >
> > I am updating my .msh parser for the new version 4 format. What I
> > found
> > was that nodes
On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 14:31 +0200, Guilherme Saturnino wrote:
>
> I would also like to suggest 2 improvements for future Gmsh versions:
>
> 1. Is it possible to provide Gmsh 4 binaries that are compatible
> with
> CentOS 6? It is an old but still widely used Linux distribution.
> This
> has bee
mesh file for the
> gmsh. The test.msh file is the mesh file for our code. Any co-operation
> will be appreciable.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Mohammad
>
>
> _______
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh@onelab.info
>
conditions (e.g. distributed load on a circular
> line segment or pressure on a curved surface).
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Pieter Reumers
> ___
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh@onelab.info
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
--
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
After the boolean operations, save the current model to a BREP with
gmsh.write("model.brep")
Then read back the BREP from the .geo with ShapeFromFile()
Regards--jeremy thelerwww.seamplex.com id="-x-evo-selection-start-marker">
On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 17:04 +0300, Роман Бутов wrote:
> Is there a wa
e are people that are happy with FORTRAN.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
RTFM
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Specifying-mesh-element-sizes
On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 02:10 +, Jianan Zhang wrote:
>
>
> Hi, all,
>
>
>
> I want to generate a mesh which has denser meshes in a specific area, but
> sparser meshes in other areas. How can I achieve this?
>
>
>
On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 12:42 +, michael.a...@infineon.com wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
>
>
> it would be indeed a valuable feature if there is a command to reorient
> surfaces of volumes
>
> automatically in a way that the normal is pointing outwards, as it would help
> to set the natural
both with PythonOCC and Gmsh.
BTW, I love the new Gmsh API :-)
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 08:46 +0200, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> How could I get point coordinates at python api?
> gmsh.model.getBoundingBox(0, point_tag)
Is there any way to get the center of gravity of a volume or surface?
--
jeremy
www.seamplex.com
_
Hey all
What's the difference between fields Attractor and Distance?
Regards
--
jeremy
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 12:35 -0500, Juan E. Sanchez wrote:
> Hello Jeremy,
>
> Is my understanding correct that there would only be one material volume
> per brep file? I would use freecad, but it seems painful to try to
no
> import one brep per material into gmsh, and then attempt to get gm
t;> _______
> >> gmsh mailing list
> >> gmsh@onelab.info
> >> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
> >>
> > ___
> > gmsh mailing list
> > gmsh@onelab.info
> > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
> --
>
> --
> Dr. sc. techn. Benedikt Oswald - first engineer - LSPR AG - phone +41 43
> 366 90 74
> Grubenstrasse 9, CH-8045 Zürich, benedikt.oswald@lspr.swiss
>
> --
>
>
> ___
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh@onelab.info
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
--
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
what would the resulting "script.geo" be?
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 19:41 +0100, Octavio Castillo Reyes wrote:
> Dear gmsh users and support team,
>
> I'm working on meshing for geophysical applications using gmsh. I have
> special interest in tetrahedral meshes. Since last November I'm trying to
>
Hi all!
Is it possible to choose mesh.algorithm in a surface-by-surface case?
I would like to have most of them to be meshed with frontal but one particular
feature is complex and needs
the meshadapt algo.
Thanks
--
jeremy
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mai
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 20:02 +0900, 허준영 wrote:
> However, I can't find any part that can put physical properties of the
> model(like velocity, resistivity or etc) in Gmsh.
> Does the Gmsh not provide that kind of functions?
no, you have to define physical entities and then somehow (in your solv
I had to code that algorithm myself based on a k-dimensional tree with the node
coordinates and a list of elements asssociated to each node.If someone has a
better algorithm, I am also happy to hear.
Regards--jeremy
On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 19:56 +0100, Octavio Castillo Reyes wrote:
> Dear all,
> I
Hi Chrstophe
I tried setting it to "MM" and the result was the same. I will take a look
again and send a mwe illustrating the issue.
Regards
jeremy
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017, 08:45 Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
>
>
> > On 4 Dec 2017, at 10:59, Jeremy Theler wrote:
>
Is the new property Geometry.OCCTargetUnit working as expected?
How can I revert back to the original behavior, i.e. do not assume anything
about units in an imported OCC
model and leave them as "non-dimensional"?
Thanks
--
Jeremy Theler
www.se
Hi Mayank
I have written that functionality into my own framework called wasora
(www.seamplex.com/wasora)
Say you have a .msh file with point-wise defined data as
inhttps://bitbucket.org/seamplex/wasora/src/0321d32894d66056e64b2035ac98887b7aa4f29b/examples/tiny.msh?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-
Coherence
You need version >= 3.0.6
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 07:43 +0330, Ali Jamalifard wrote:
> Hello Dear
> I want to mesh a multi-domain three dimensional geometry using Gmesh.
> my geometry file is in .Step format.
> after generation of 3D mesh, the result mesh is not conformal between domain
>
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#index-FAQ
Answer E5.3
On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 19:28 +0100, Fabrice Pepin wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
>
>
> When 3D meshing, 1D and 2D elements are created ? Is there a command to
> delete 1D and 2D elements before exporting the 3D mesh ?
>
>
> Thank you.
>
017655441319
>
>
> > On Thu 12 Oct 3:26:09 am, jeremy theler
> >
> > wrote:http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Elementary-vs-physical-entities
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017, 17:36 Fernando Lorenzo wrote:
> > > If you save your mesh as To
lect the volumes, I don't find a Meshing
> command to mesh only a particular physical entity.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Shamsul Arefin
>
> ___
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh@onelab.info
> http://onelab.info/mailman/lis
e and
then trying to find common nodes between volumetric elements:
https://bitbucket.org/seamplex/wasora/src/3dd04c3c1c236adae5799354114698112c46e232/src/mesh/neighbors.c?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally s
On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 12:13 +0200, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> I am looking for code in gmsh that reads the msh file (say of an 2d
> triangular grid as the msh file attached in the mail) and populates the
> faces which are displayed in the mesh but not written in the gmsh file.
> (As far as I under
compsolid.
Will you guys at Gmsh also add an option to really return a compsolid
or will this behavior be the final one?
Thanks
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
Make sure you do not have "recombine all triangular meshes" checked in
options -> mesh
you can explicitly turn it off by adding
Mesh.RecombineAll = 0;
to the geo
--
jeremy
On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 22:14 +, César Pablo Camusso wrote:
> Dear partners,
> I want a mesh with only triangles, but I
Does this work for you?
Physical Volume (1) = {1:1000};
Physical Volume (1) -= {123};
BTW, what solver are you using? I suggest www.seamplex.com/milonga
--
jeremy
On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 18:39 -0500, Alex Lindsay wrote:
> I have a large lattice geometry generated by for loops and extrusion.
> I
ot have internal faces;
> 2) if I check "save all" I loose the physical entities definition.
>
>
>
> -----Messaggio originale-
> Da: Jeremy Theler [mailto:jer...@seamplex.com]
> Inviato: giovedì 29 giugno 2017 11:53
> A: Alessandro Vicini; gmsh@onelab.info
>
gt;
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: gmsh [mailto:gmsh-boun...@ace20.montefiore.ulg.ac.be] Per conto
> di Jeremy Theler
> Inviato: giovedì 29 giugno 2017 11:17
> A: gmsh@onelab.info
> Oggetto: Re: [Gmsh] Gmsh .msh file
>
> See
>
> http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.h
See
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Elementary-vs-physical-entities
As much as I would like to say RTFM, I have to say that this has
happened to me when I started using gmsh and I believe it happened to
many other users.
I wonder if there exist a more intuitive way of dealing the
Mesh.Sav
It is in appendix B.3:
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Mesh-options-list
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 15:49 +0200, Vincent HUBER wrote:
> Hello Guillaume,
>
>
> Thank you for your answer.
> I'm a bit confused : I do not find this option in the doc
> http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html
>
>
Thanks for the example Christophe.
How do I apply PointsOf{} to a merged BREP?
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 20:52 +0200, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
>
>
> Here's an example, for Gmsh 3.0.2:
>
>
> SetFactory("OpenCASCADE");
&g
tools -> options -> geometry -> surface labels
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 15:05 +0200, marcel_mueller...@web.de wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I'm a student of Engineering Sciences and a newbie in using gmsh but
> did some tutorials.
>
&g
> I have found an another way to import a brep file. However I can't
> understand how the characteristic sizes are applied. I want to apply a
> more dense mesh around the internal surfaces without the cost of a
> field command.
I don't either.
But what I do is I set the characteristic length of
.
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:39 +0200, HASSEN Ghazi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are currently using GMSH in order to mesh two or three dimensional
> structures in mechanic. We would like to know if it is possible when
> meshing to get the connectivity of the v
)
at /home/gtheler/codigos/3ros/build/gmsh/Mesh/meshGFaceLloyd.cpp:948
948 s1 = borders[i].get_segment(0);
(gdb)
Any suggestions?
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
// use gmsh >= 2.16.0
SetFactory("OpenCASCADE");
Point(1) = {0, 0, 0, 0.125};
Point(2) = {0,
Yey! You finally took my point!
http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/2016/010848.html
> I am aware of such cost. Maybe it could be lowered by switching to git
> and take advantage of its branching and merging mechanisms...
+1 for the Gmsh team :-)
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
13830
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Sat, 2017-03-18 at 09:46 +0100, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> > On 17 Mar 2017, at 23:24, Bram Sterling
> > wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to mesh a 3D 2-material construct created in another program
> > (FreeCAD) and brought into
Can the new OpenCASCADE factory be used to first merge say an imported
2D BREP and the extrude the path? Pseudo-geo:
SetFactory("OpenCASCADE");
Merge("2dbrep.brep");
Extrude{0,0,0.3}{ Surface{1:3}; }
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 21:38 +0100
+1!
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 14:49 +0100, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
>
>
> As a little teaser, just to let you know that I'm coding a direct
> interface to OpenCASCADE CAD creation right in .geo files. This will
> in particular support a
If you go through the post-processing the .msh file you can also change
the ordering of the nodes in order to get the normals in the direction
you want.
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 12:15 +, DILASSER Guillaume wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
>
>
>
Hi
$ gmsh -2 myfile.geo
will generate myfile.msh without opening the GUI.
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 18:14 +1100, Thomas Charles Reading Moore wrote:
> I have a .geo file which I'd like to create a .msh file from. My
> current procedure is
>
&g
ption, say www.seamplex.com/fino
BTW, for the original developers, it would be nice to somehow being able
to change the hardcoded %.16g in runtime, for example to reduce the size
of the resulting ASCII mesh files.
Cheers
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Sat, 2017-01-21 at 22:53 +, Fabrice P
t;? So far what I am doing is
Characteristic Length { 1:1 } = expression;
and expect the model to have less than ten thousand points.
Is there a cleaner way?
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http:/
Hi all
Is it possible to execute a Print "screenshot.png"; statement without
having Gmsh to try to connect to an X server?
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
};
Line Loop(5) = {4, 1, 2, 3};
Plane Surface(6) = {5};
gtheler@tom:~/run$ for i in `seq 1 10`; do m4 -Dlc=$i/10 basic.geo >
basic-$i.geo; gmsh -2 basic-$i.geo; done
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 15:57 +, Al wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'd like to have a s
AFAI, rotations should not give rise to singularities in the jacobian.
In fact, these orderings are equivalents as you state, they give the
same normals following the "right-hand rule".
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 11:04 +0100, Nan Li wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
>
> I met a problem about the node orde
If the data is given node-based, this can be done more or less easily
with awk. If the data is cell-centered (as it seems to be the case from
your description) probably a more complex solution will be needed.
Can you give us an example .msh file you want to convert to plain ASCII
columns?
--
jere
/gmsh/2013/008183.html
http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/2014/008833.html
http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/2014/008914.html
http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/2015/009739.html
http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/2015/009920.html
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:09 AM
.erase
> > 22971ajohnen
> > (std::find(v[j]->onWhat()->mesh_vertices.begin(),
> > gtheler@tom:~/codigos/3ros/gmsh$
> >
> >
> > Any comment or solution is appreciated.
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy Theler
> > www.seam
tch to git or mercurial instead of sticking with
svn.
Thanks
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo