Bob Johnson wrote:
Hello everyone,
My system consists of DNA and a carbon nanotube. I would like to restrain the
DNA bases in a way that the plane formed by each base is parallel to the
z-axis. In other words, I would like to orient the bases such that the normal
of each plane is perpendicular to
Kushal Seth wrote:
Hi all !
I am running a MD simulation and i got
You appear to be trying to do an energy minimization, which although
often able to be done by the same code as molecular dynamics, is
inherently non-dynamical. Hence it's unwise to confuse matters by
referring to one as "MD".
try looking for errors in your pdb file, try double precision EM. it
seems that something wrong is with your pdb, because the value of your
maximum force. Also check your topology.
Good luck
Cesar
Kushal Seth escribió:
Hi all !
I am running a MD simulation and i got
"Warning: 1-4 interaction
Hi everybody,
I've been trying to compile gromacs-3.1.4 onto a linux server with
Red Hat v 7.3 OS. I was able to compile the fftw library without
incident, but when I issue the configure command (>./configure
--prefix=/home/voklejas/gromacs) in the gromacs-3.1.4 directory I get
the following
Hi all !
I am running a MD simulation and i got
"Warning: 1-4 interaction between 1 and 6 at distance 1.102 which is
larger than the 1-4 table size 1.000 nm
These are ignored for the rest of the simulation
This usually means your system is exploding,
if not, you should increase table-extension in
Hi Bob,
Just a comment: if you don't have a homogeneous DNA sequence (and
perhaps even in such a case) you will probably end distorting the
sugar-phosphate backbone of the DNA if forcing every base pair to be
normal to a common z-axis.
Anyway, look for one of these two programs:
freehelix (by Di
Hello everyone,
My system consists of DNA and a carbon nanotube. I would like to restrain the
DNA bases in a way that the plane formed by each base is parallel to the
z-axis. In other words, I would like to orient the bases such that the normal
of each plane is perpendicular to the z-axis. I don't
Hello to everybody, I am new of bioinformatics (I am a computer
scientist), but I'm trying to learn.
Actually I am working on a model of a holoprotein (protein with "other"
molecules), cp26, a transmembrane protein found in tylacoids), modelled
for homology (56% identity) from an axisting one (1rw
Syma,
The answer is yes. However, they have to be part of the same molecule
"description". That is, they have to be listed in the same [ atoms ]
section and so on. You neeed GROMACS to consider them to be part of
the same "molecule", which it can do without having bonds between
them.
David
On 4/
Hi all,
I've another question, in the manual (page 39) a REMD calculator is
mentioned.
Where is it? I've tried to search it on the website without success.
Thanks again
Andrea
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.
Janne,
You may want to look on the GROMACS developers list for a lot of
recent discussion relating to energy conservation. It is a fairly
complicated issue. http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-developers/
David
On 4/11/06, Janne Hirvi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your response David
Andrea Carotti wrote:
Hi all,
I've another question, in the manual (page 39) a REMD calculator is
mentioned.
Where is it? I've tried to search it on the website without success.
It's on the TODO list.
Thanks again
Andrea
___
gmx-users mailing lis
From: David van der Spoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [gmx-users]
Re: Problems with x2top To: Steven Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Discussion list for GROMACS users Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Steven Kirk wrote:
Hello David,
I am havi
> Thank you for your 30 seconds.
> I guess what I was getting as, is there anything I should be aware of when
> applying distance restraints (known problems etc) that would have saved me
> making common mistakes.
Don't know, never done it.
> The gromacs manual is good, I would hesitate before say
Dear gmx developer,
I want to modify repl_ex.c for my system. I have read the source code.
There is one point I am not clear. In the function
replica_exchange( ...), all dynamical information of a system will be
exchanged between two replicas when exchanging two replicas is
implemented. It looks l
Dear Gmxers:
In my simulation, I applied a uniform electric field across the whole
system, and I used
g_potential -f full -s full -o -sl 200
to observe the voltage drop along z direction.
I am confused with the voltage distribution. What time is it referred
to?
Or, it is an average over
Thank you for your 30 seconds.
I guess what I was getting as, is there anything I should be aware of when
applying distance restraints (known problems etc) that would have saved me
making common mistakes.
The gromacs manual is good, I would hesitate before saying wonderful
Thanks anyway,
-Sy
Besides that, searching through the gromacs user list with keywords like "distance" "restraints" "between" "molecules" would have given some good hits.Tsjerk
On 4/11/06, Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,>> I was just wondering if is possible, in gromacs to apply distance> restraints> be
> Hi,
>
> I was just wondering if is possible, in gromacs to apply distance
> restraints
> between molecules. So I have two ligands (part of the same complex) that I
> would like to keep together, even though they are not actually bonded
> together.
gromacs has a wonderful manual, in which there i
Janne Hirvi wrote:
Thanks for your response David!
I tried to simulate bulk water (1372 SPC/E molecules) with your parameters and
observed same kind of problems with energy conservation as with my earlier
parameters (rlist=rvdw=rcoulomb=1.2 & nstlist=10). In single precision NVE
simulation (500p
Thanks to all for the quick clarifications.
Andrea
- Original Message -
From: "Xavier Periole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] replica exchange doubt
Andrea Carotti wrote:
Hi all gmx-ers,
I
Andrea Carotti wrote:
Hi all gmx-ers,
I have a doubt concerning the REMD setup. Let's say I want to use 12
cpus to make a REMD at 2 different temp 300 and 400K of the same system.
Should I prepare every tpr file with the -np option set to 6?
and then run the mdrun with -np 12 -multi -s 300.tpr
From: "Andrea Carotti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
To:
Subject: [gmx-users] replica exchange doubt
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:14:51 +0200
Hi all gmx-ers,
I have a doubt concerning the REMD setup. Let's say I want to use 12 cpus
to make a REMD at 2 differe
Hi,
I was just wondering if is possible, in gromacs to apply distance restraints
between molecules. So I have two ligands (part of the same complex) that I
would like to keep together, even though they are not actually bonded
together.
Thanks in advance,
-Syma
*
Hi all gmx-ers,
I have a doubt concerning the REMD setup. Let's say I want to use 12 cpus to
make a REMD at 2 different temp 300 and 400K of the same system.
Should I prepare every tpr file with the -np option set to 6?
and then run the mdrun with -np 12 -multi -s 300.tpr 400.tpr -replica
X -re
Hi, I've some problems in using the command g_dielectric in various example
of water(spc ,tip5, tip4).The error appears to be the same for each
model;this is for spc water model:
Read data set containing 2 colums and 101 rows
Assuming (from data) that timestep is 0.1, nxtail = 101
Creating stan
Thanks for your response David!
I tried to simulate bulk water (1372 SPC/E molecules) with your parameters and
observed same kind of problems with energy conservation as with my earlier
parameters (rlist=rvdw=rcoulomb=1.2 & nstlist=10). In single precision NVE
simulation (500ps) drift in total ene
Dear users:
If I excluded the interactions between two groups through defining
"energygrp_excl=Group1 Group2" in mdp file,
I am sure no interactions between them during simulation. However, how
about the local electric field between
these two groups? Is it still existing?
Thanks
Xie
28 matches
Mail list logo