Richa taimni wrote:
Dear all,
while using the g_sangle option in gromacs to
calculate the angle between 2 groups, and distance
between 2 grps I m facing problem. As soon as I select
the first grp frm the index file all the calculations
are performed according to the first option..it does
not ask
Yangyang Shen wrote:
Thanks for your reply, David.
The mpich version, I think it is mpich-1.2.7
And I use gcc (is this one type of mpi lib?) to compile.
Would pgi6.0 be another option?
No PGI onky gives more trouble and less performance, see recent posts.
Your best options are to install either
In God We Trust
Hello
Here is your topology. Thank you very much in
advanceKarim MahnamInstitute of Biochemistry and
Biophysics (IBB)Tehran University P.O.box 13145-1384Tehran
Iran http://www.ibb.ut.ac.ir/
-Original
Message-From: hadi behzadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
gmx-users@groma
Dear all,
while using the g_sangle option in gromacs to
calculate the angle between 2 groups, and distance
between 2 grps I m facing problem. As soon as I select
the first grp frm the index file all the calculations
are performed according to the first option..it does
not ask me the second grp.
Pl
Are you using VMD to view the trajectory?
If so, in the Graphical Representations window, select the Periodic tab.
Then get it to draw the periodic image to the right hand side of your
"central / orginal" image.
That will help with visualisation of what a PBC means and how it works.
Catch ya,
D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello fellow Gromacs-users,
Today I was extracting PDB snapshots from a solvated DNA 12mer simulation
trajectory.
When I went to view the snapshots, I saw that one of the DNA strands suddenly
jumped
some nanometers away from its partner during certain frames. I remembe
Hello fellow Gromacs-users,
Today I was extracting PDB snapshots from a solvated DNA 12mer simulation
trajectory.
When I went to view the snapshots, I saw that one of the DNA strands suddenly
jumped
some nanometers away from its partner during certain frames. I remembered that
there was
a note
Thanks for your reply, David.
The mpich version, I think it is mpich-1.2.7
And I use gcc (is this one type of mpi lib?) to compile.
Would pgi6.0 be another option?
Also I don't get this 'interrupt SIGSEGV' error for my other simulations.
Do you have any clue why?
Thanks a lot for your help.
Yang
hadi behzadi wrote:
hello
I have a topology file for propanol as is in below , how we can obtain
topology file for 100 molecule of propanol
thanks
chapter 5
are you sure you want this force field by the way?
in the systems section write
drg 100
;
;
; This file was gen
Hi gmx-users,i am trying to run a POPC simulation. this is what i have done. i downloaded the popc128apdb, lipid.itp , popc.itp files from the following website
http://moose.bio.ucalgary.ca/index.php?page=Downloads then i also downloaded the ffgmx_lipids files from the gromacs website.i have copie
hello I have a topology file for propanol as is in below , how we can obtain topology file for 100 molecule of propanol thanks ; ; ; This file was generated by PRODRG version 051202.0518; PRODRG written/copyrighted by Daan van Aalten; ; Questions/comm
Hi,
I am trying to model a protein that contains
4-fluoro-phenylalanine. I've generated an entirely new set of
parameters (using the Generalized Atom Force Field) to use in gromacs.
I understand that I need to modify the .rtp file and aminoacid.dat
files in order to obtain a .top file for t
Yangyang Shen wrote:
Hi,
I get the following error immidiately after the mdrun starts
p4_error: interrupt SIGSEGV: 11
It is also reproducible if I run the same simulation again.
Could anyone please give me some hint?
which mpich version?
you probably need to recompile with another mpi lib.
Hi,
I get the following error immidiately after the mdrun starts
p4_error: interrupt SIGSEGV: 11
It is also reproducible if I run the same simulation again.
Could anyone please give me some hint?
Thanks a lot,
Yangyang
___
gmx-users mailing list
Anthony Cruz wrote:
Hi:
I have been trying to made a solvent box of methacrylic acid using parameters
from PRODRG. I change it to GROMOS96 parameters and use charges from DFT
calculation. I do the energy minimization with out any problem. I run a 2ns
MD (NVT) with out any problem too. But wh
Hi:
I have been trying to made a solvent box of methacrylic acid using parameters
from PRODRG. I change it to GROMOS96 parameters and use charges from DFT
calculation. I do the energy minimization with out any problem. I run a 2ns
MD (NVT) with out any problem too. But when I try to run an MD
Alan Dodd wrote:
That'd certainly work if the movement is continuous,
but if there are many fluctuations near the crossover
point then sorting out which steps to fudge it at
could be a pain. Assuming you only care about the Z
seperation, I'd be tempted to use g_traj to plot both
groups, and sub
I can also use VMD - not quite as comfortable as g_dist with the pbc
problem solved, but probably the quick and dirty 'fix', since I will
have to look at the trajectories anyway.
Thanks,
Kay.
On May 22, 2006, at 6:27 PM, Alan Dodd wrote:
That'd certainly work if the movement is continuous,
Hi Kay,
How about using trjconv to remove periodicity ...then take the modified
trajectory and feed it into g_dist?
I think this could be a possible solution..
I'd appreciate it, if the hard working and ever resourceful users/developers can
inform us whether this is a possible option??...
i
That'd certainly work if the movement is continuous,
but if there are many fluctuations near the crossover
point then sorting out which steps to fudge it at
could be a pain. Assuming you only care about the Z
seperation, I'd be tempted to use g_traj to plot both
groups, and subtract the z-position
yep, thanks!
K.
On May 22, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Xavier Periole wrote:
Kay Gottschalk wrote:
They are not interacting. The distance is larger than 40 Å. But
still,if the distance to the mirror image is 41 Å and to the same
protein in the box is 45 Å, the distance to the mirror image will
b
Kay Gottschalk wrote:
They are not interacting. The distance is larger than 40 Å. But
still,if the distance to the mirror image is 41 Å and to the same
protein in the box is 45 Å, the distance to the mirror image will be
plotted... We are indeed pulling on z.
Best, Kay.
Good, so the solu
They are not interacting. The distance is larger than 40 Å. But
still,if the distance to the mirror image is 41 Å and to the same
protein in the box is 45 Å, the distance to the mirror image will be
plotted... We are indeed pulling on z.
Best, Kay.
On May 22, 2006, at 6:02 PM, Xavier Periol
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
First of all, I would like to give my thanks for the help David van
der Spoel has given us.
I'm doing an energy minimization with mdrun without problems. However,
I've noticed that Gromacs is only adding the polar hydrogens and not
all the hydrogens durin
Kay Gottschalk wrote:
Hi there,
we are doing a pulling simulation and want to monitor the distance
between two atoms during pulling. Using g_dist the distance is
calculated between all mirror images of the periodic boundary
conditions, and the minimal distance is calculated. In our case,
Depends on the force field. Take opls/aa for all hydrogens.Best,Kay.On May 22, 2006, at 3:52 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Dear All, First of all, I would like to give my thanks for the help David van der Spoel has given us. I'm doing an energy minimization with mdrun without problems. However, I
Dear All,
First of all, I would like to give my thanks for the help David van der Spoel has given us.
I'm doing an energy minimization with mdrun without problems. However,
I've noticed that Gromacs is only adding the polar hydrogens and not
all the hydrogens during the energy minimization. I wou
Hi there,
we are doing a pulling simulation and want to monitor the distance
between two atoms during pulling. Using g_dist the distance is
calculated between all mirror images of the periodic boundary
conditions, and the minimal distance is calculated. In our case, this
is uncomfortable,
You should use neither, at least not for Coulomb. Only PME can be used for
systems containing charges. For system containing exclusively neutral
molecules, you can use a shift function, if the cut-off is longer than the
range of the interaction. For water that would be roughly 1.2 nm.
Be that
After checking the tpr file with gmxdump I found all the 5 residues in the tpr file! So I really dont understand the source of the error.On 5/22/06, Abhishek Rathod
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,I am new to this list and to gromacs.I used a pdb file 1PLX from the PDB database and ran gromacs on it
Hi!
I want to put in the box (with solvent) a lot of ions PO4---
How can I do it? I use genion, but the type PO4--- doesn't exist.
I've the molecule created with Hyperchem.
than you very much
___
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice: chiama da PC a telefo
Hi,I am new to this list and to gromacs.I used a pdb file 1PLX from the PDB database and ran gromacs on it.While running the g_rama function, I got the following error."Dihedral around 23,25 not found in topology. Using mult=3
Dihedral around 25,28 not found in topology. Using mult=3Dihedral around
A B wrote:
Please refer to my recent paper, J. Chem. Theor. Comp. 2 (2006) 1-11.
Yes, this is exactly what I mean - an appropriate smoothing function
("shift") works fine, but simple group-based truncation does not; that
this does not work has indeed been known since long before GROMACS was
Please refer to my recent paper, J. Chem. Theor. Comp. 2 (2006) 1-11.
Yes, this is exactly what I mean - an appropriate smoothing function
("shift") works fine, but simple group-based truncation does not; that this
does not work has indeed been known since long before GROMACS was born.
Mayb
can you please send this paper to me? email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
regards,
karamyog.On 5/22/06, David van der Spoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A B wrote:> I am curious about the reason for the heating that allegedly occurs with> cutoffs in NVE simulations ("The use of (electrostatic) cutoff
A B wrote:
I am curious about the reason for the heating that allegedly occurs with
cutoffs in NVE simulations ("The use of (electrostatic) cutoffs is well
known to cause heating in NVE simulations."). This should not, and does
not, happen if an appropriate smoothing function is applied. Does t
I am curious about the reason for the heating that allegedly occurs with
cutoffs in NVE simulations ("The use of (electrostatic) cutoffs is well
known to cause heating in NVE simulations."). This should not, and does not,
happen if an appropriate smoothing function is applied. Does this heating
Hi,
While writing some scripts that iterated over PME parameters looking to
satisfy some optimality criteria, I ran into a problem that grompp needs
fourier_nx to be divisible by the number of nodes in order to construct
the .tpr file. This isn't noted anywhere in the documentation, and it
be
38 matches
Mail list logo