Re: Fwd: [gmx-users] Hen egg white lysozyme.

2006-08-15 Thread Viswanadham Sridhara
Hello Dr.Spoel and others,There is one more problem with the simulation of hen egg white lysozyme simulation in water I am running. The timestep I could use is just 0.5 fs or 0.0005ps. Is there any way around to increase the timestep. This is how a part of my mdp file looks like:; RUN CONTROL PARAM

[gmx-users] RE: pdb2gmx error

2006-08-15 Thread MURAT CETINKAYA
I will do what you suggest David. But, I have plenty of these lines, so I was avoiding that method. However, it seems the only solution right now. Thanks Murat > Hi all, > > I have a small problem with pdb2gmx. I have a non-standard residue with rtp > parameters entered manually into oplsaa data

[gmx-users] steroid topology

2006-08-15 Thread dhruva chakravorty
Hello, I have been having trouble with a topology I created for androst-5-ene-3,17-dione (GROMOS 96 force field). I have found the molecule to bend inwards withing 100 ps of equilibration, something which has not been seen by others who have used CHARMM or AMBER. I have also tried to convert the t

[gmx-users] steroid topology

2006-08-15 Thread dhruva chakravorty
Hello everyone, I have been having trouble with a topology I created for androst-5-ene-3,17-dione (GROMOS 96 force field). I have found the molecule to bend inwards withing 100 ps of equilibration, something which has not been seen by others who have used CHARMM or AMBER. I have also tried to conv

[gmx-users] water shell model

2006-08-15 Thread Luciano Costa
Hi all and Spoel Based on mailing list answer at Mar 20th 2003, which discribed the entire topology file for water shell model, referencing on J. Phys. Chem B. 105 (2618) 2001, I have tryed to run water polarization MD with this file.itp. However, running grompp a message "Water polarization shoul

Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx error

2006-08-15 Thread David van der Spoel
MURAT CETINKAYA wrote: Hi all, I have a small problem with pdb2gmx. I have a non-standard residue with rtp parameters entered manually into oplsaa database. When I try to convert my pdb file into gro, I get: - Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 3.3.1 Source code file: t

[gmx-users] pdb2gmx error

2006-08-15 Thread MURAT CETINKAYA
Hi all, I have a small problem with pdb2gmx. I have a non-standard residue with rtp parameters entered manually into oplsaa database. When I try to convert my pdb file into gro, I get: - Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 3.3.1 Source code file: toputil.c, line: 94 Fatal

Re: [gmx-users] clusters [4Fe-4S]+2

2006-08-15 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Elias, pdb2gmx does not read CONECT records in the pdb file. You have to add S(Cys) - Fe bonds in the specbond.dat file. The cause for not getting any errors is that pdb2gmx sees cysteines, which it can handle, and iron ions, which it can handle. But it doesn't think of connecting them and doe

[gmx-users] clusters [4Fe-4S]+2

2006-08-15 Thread Elias santos
Hi !! I to construct to the block for residuo FS4 of the two clusters in the  .rtp file of the force field ffgmx with all the linkings, angles etc., beyond the on and not on parameters. When I run pdb2gmx, it does not give menssagem of error, but the linkings between the cysteins (SG) and atoms of

[gmx-users] thanks

2006-08-15 Thread Eudes Fileti
Dear DavidThank you for your reply. Your tip it will very usefeul.Bestseef__  Eudes Eterno Fileti  Centro de Ciência Naturais e Humanas Universidade Federal do ABC

Re: [gmx-users] histidine (HISB) planarity >> how about Trp?

2006-08-15 Thread Erik Lindahl
Hi, On Aug 15, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Berk Hess wrote: I do not think there is an error in ffG53a6.rtp for TRP. OPLS and GROMOS use different approaches to keep rings planar. I don't know which force field would be closest to reality. But I think slighlty more or less rigid rings will have little i

Re: [gmx-users] histidine (HISB) planarity >> how about Trp?

2006-08-15 Thread Berk Hess
From: Shirley Siu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] histidine (HISB) planarity >> how about Trp? Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:07:13 +0200 Hi everybody, I am also trying G53a6 in my protein simulation

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Variable ci yet-Samuel's problem!

2006-08-15 Thread Mark Abraham
David van der Spoel wrote: Samuel Silva Pita wrote: Dear Mr. Spoel, i'd described before at GMX lists that my topology of FAD was built by hand and using the atoms adequately for FF G53a6 at GMX 3.3.1. After the addition of atoms , bonds, constants ,etc. at ffg53a6.atp, ffg53a6.hbd and all o

[gmx-users] Re: Variable ci yet-Samuel's problem!

2006-08-15 Thread David van der Spoel
Samuel Silva Pita wrote: Dear Mr. Spoel, i'd described before at GMX lists that my topology of FAD was built by hand and using the atoms adequately for FF G53a6 at GMX 3.3.1. After the addition of atoms , bonds, constants ,etc. at ffg53a6.atp, ffg53a6.hbd and all others arquives, I proceed to