Dear all,
I have a query,
1. Are two trajectories comparable if each one of them
has been run in a different version of gromacs? Eg,
v3.2 and v3.3.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Raghu
**
Y. M. Ragothaman,
Research Scholar,
Centre for Computational Biology and
Dear all,
I have a query,
1. Are two trajectories comparable if each one of them
has been run in a different version of gromacs? Eg,
v3.2 and v3.3.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Raghu
**
Y. M. Ragothaman,
Research Scholar,
Centre for Computational Biology and
Dear all,
I have a query,
1. Are two trajectories comparable if each one of them
has been run in a different version of gromacs? Eg,
v3.2 and v3.3.
Define comparable. If you mean are they sampling the same thermodynamic
ensemble, then the answer is yes if you used the same algorithms. If you
I think the statistical reserves but the two trajectories are not exactly the same.
On 9/9/06, Ragothaman Yennamalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,I have a query,1. Are two trajectories comparable if each one of themhas been run in a different version of gromacs? Eg,
v3.2 and v3.3.Thanks in
try - cluster, and then as cluster group protein.Kay.On Sep 9, 2006, at 11:09 AM, C.W. Liang wrote: hi, all user: i performed the dimer simulation, and want to realize the interaction between two peptides. but frequently, i encountered this kind of problem: sometimes peptides moved out of the
Hi dear friends,
I just made an essential dynamics of 5ns; I calculated the cosine content of PC1 byusing
g_analyze -f proj5ns.xvg -cc proj5ns_cc.xvg
it gave: "Cosine content of set 1 with 0.5 periods: 0.749969"
the valueis rather too high.
However, I foundthat only trajectorybetween 3300~3890
6 matches
Mail list logo