pragya chohan wrote:
Hi justin
I placed POPC membrane in a box too of same dimension as the box of
alamethicin and centred it too so that alamethicin is placed correctly
in the membrane.
I am attaching the pdb please have a look.
Any help would be appreciated
Check out http://wiki.gromacs.or
Pragya,
I just realized that I may have read your message incorrectly. If you'd like to
send me your PDB file off-list, I'd be happy to have a look.
-Justin
Quoting "Justin A. Lemkul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting pragya chohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi justin
> > I placed POPC membrane i
Quoting pragya chohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi justin
> I placed POPC membrane in a box too of same dimension as the box of
> alamethicin and centred it too so that alamethicin is placed correctly in the
> membrane.
> I am attaching the pdb please have a look.Any help would be appreciated
Looks
Hi justin
I placed POPC membrane in a box too of same dimension as the box of alamethicin
and centred it too so that alamethicin is placed correctly in the membrane.
I am attaching the pdb please have a look.Any help would be appreciated
Pragya
> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:42:01 -0500> From:
It works fine for me under 3.3.1 - what command line are you issuing?
-Justin
Quoting Dmytro Kovalskyy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Trjorder does not write trajectory file, only nshell.xvg
>
> This is true for 3.3.2 and 3.3.1 versions.
>
> Dima
>
>
> ___
Trjorder does not write trajectory file, only nshell.xvg
This is true for 3.3.2 and 3.3.1 versions.
Dima
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gr
Dear Bharat,
OK, I went ahead and ran with your topologies using my own run
scripts. My runs haven't finished yet, but looking at just
values from equilibration, I seem to be seeing roughly
the same trends you do. In particular:
(1) The forward simulation always gives dv/dlambda values that are
Bharat,
Your values for the first set of calculations (the forward case?)
below look really weird. I suspect you have something messed up in
those runs. Have you checked that your define statements worked
properly, and checked your run input files? In particular, your
is staying almost constant a
Quoting pragya chohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks Justin for your reply. I am generating the starting structure through
> genbox.
> I added popc as solvent around alamethicin after aligning alamethicin in a
> box and centering it in the box and followed same procedure for popc also. Do
> you hav
Thanks Justin for your reply. I am generating the starting structure through
genbox.
I added popc as solvent around alamethicin after aligning alamethicin in a box
and centering it in the box and followed same procedure for popc also. Do you
have any better way?
> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 10:22
Since alamethicin works on its own, it suggests to me that the introduction of
alamethicin into POPC is what's causing the problem, and judging by the
enormous potential energies and forces, it appears to be bad contacts/atomic
overlap (at least, that's been the cause of problems in my experience).
> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 09:01:48 -0500>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: gmx-users@gromacs.org> Subject: Re: [gmx-users]
mdrun error>> Check out the wiki at:>>
http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Errors#LINCS_warnings>> Alternatively, search
the list for some
Mark Abraham wrote:
I installed ffamber ports for gromacs, generated gro and topology
files for a DNA structure with pdb2gmx, a box with editconf and added
solvation with genbox. When I try to run grompp i obtain these errors:
checking input for internal consistency...
calling cpp -traditional.
13 matches
Mail list logo