Quoting Di Pan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi, All
>
> I do my md simulation for 30ns, but after 20ns the protein move out of
> the box, so it seems that the protein is broken in .trr file. I try to
> use trjconv to put the protein back into the box and make the protein
> whole. The command is like bel
Hi, All
I do my md simulation for 30ns, but after 20ns the protein move out of
the box, so it seems that the protein is broken in .trr file. I try to
use trjconv to put the protein back into the box and make the protein
whole. The command is like below:
trjconv trjc -f *.trr -o out.trr -s *.tpr -
servaas michielssens wrote:
Thanks for your help, I checked the perl script (amb2gmx.pl) it should
work for a solvated protein. The solvend and box are converted to
gromacs but the box information is not converted as it should, amber
only defines d and 3 angels (+information in the topology t
nur avneet wrote:
Sir
i want to use makehole program (gromacs 3.1.4)and i used the grompp
command on dmpc.pdb with position restraints as specified in the tutorial.
the position restraint file is as follows :
[ position_restraints ]
; atom type fx fy fz
8 1 0.0
Sir
i want to use makehole program (gromacs 3.1.4)and i used the grompp command on
dmpc.pdb with position restraints as specified in the tutorial.
the position restraint file is as follows :
[ position_restraints ]
; atom type fx fy fz
8 1 0.0 0.0 1000.0
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:03:53 -0800
From: "David Mobley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] restart an amber run in gromacs
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi,
servaas michielssens wrote:
> I use
Dear Gromacs users,
I intend to perform a MD simulation of a GPCR model applying distant
restraints to the backbone of alpha helices, something like NOE
distance restraints. I guess that gromacs can't do it directly but if
I've well understand I can manually provide classical distance
restraints i
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:54:57 +0100
From: David van der Spoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] gromacs preformance versus amber
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
servaas michi
Hi Servaas,
In addition to the other remarks, also consider what happens to your system
when you instantly go from discarding all interactions beyond 8 angstrom to
including all interactions in the periodic system (with PME).
Tsjerk
--
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
Junior UD (post-doc)
Biomolecu
9 matches
Mail list logo