Dear gmx users,
I want to simulate the solid/liquid interface, so I build an infinite
inorganic molecule with pbc=full first. After I ran the system with vaccum
(at the top of system) for a few ps, I found the crystal oscillating along
the xy plane collectively and frequently, so there were too
Hi, can anybody explain me the different uses for the single and the
double precison packages.
Are there situations that explicitly require a double precision package,
and situations when i can use a single precision?
Thanks a lot
Jacopo
___
gmx-users
gmx-users-request,您好!
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:48:15 +0800
From: DeChang Li [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [gmx-users] RMSD VS. parallel simulation
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Dear all,
I
Dear all,
Can I use TIP3P model with Gromacs force field?
Moreover£¬why there isn't tip3p.gro in top file?
Thank you in advance!
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the
Frankie Montenegro wrote:
Hi everyone, I have a question regarding a forcefield build.
Is there a way to specify in the topology file how to bond two molecules
one to another?
The GROMACS implementation of bonded interactions doesn't permit them
between atoms in different [ molecules ]
Quoting Rui Li [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dear all,
Can I use TIP3P model with Gromacs force field?
First, it has been stated many times over that ffgmx is deprecated and is
questionable at best for use in new production simulations. There was a
discussion across the list about this not too long ago.
Dear gmx users,
My previous question are:
I want to simulate the solid/liquid interface, so I build an infinite
inorganic molecule with pbc=full first. After I ran the system
with vaccum (at the top of system) for a few ps, I found the crystal
oscillating along the xy plane collectively and
Dear Mark,
I can most certainly express myself in an exteremely dry and stuffed up
manner if it is more to your liking. It seems that my previous 20 postings
weren't critized at all ,even though my posts were utterly incomprohensible
and my english apolling. But
I promiss to do my absolut best
Frankie Montenegro wrote:
Would you be kind to clearify the second part of may question? Namely,
could + and - signs, mentioned in the manual and used in the rtp
files be helpfull to me
in this case?
They allow you to create bonded interactions between atoms belonging to
different parts
Hi all,
I want the temperature is gradually increased by heating from 0 to 300 K for
the first 20 ps, and then it is kept at 300 K for the next 100ps.How can I do
this
in gromacs?
Thanks in advance!
___
gmx-users mailing list
Hi Markus,
It means that I should change cutoff to the Shift, right (manual 7.3.10)
jes
On Sat, 05 Apr 2008 Markus Miettinen wrote :
Hi Jes,
to me it seems that you have rlist = rvdw:
nstlist = 10
rlist= 1.0
rvdw = 1.0
This
You can do this with simulated annealing which is implemented in gromacs.
See the simulated annealing section in the manual.
Cheers
Mitch
Rui Li wrote:
Hi all,
I want the temperature is gradually increased by heating from 0 to 300 K for
the first 20 ps, and then it is kept at 300 K for the
12 matches
Mail list logo