Hi all,
I am using gromacs 3.3.3, and have a specbond definition:
CHU C3 2 CHV C4 2 0.2 CHU CHV
This is recognised but not built:
7 out of 7 lines of specbond.dat converted successfully
Special Atom Distance matrix:
CHU5
As I stated in the first sentence, I doubt the usefulness of classical
MD for simulating crystallization of NaCl. Whatever I state after that
applies to the case of trying it with classical MD nonetheless. Please
read closely before trying to outwit however you find on this list.
Second, as is
Hi Grange,
It recognizes the possibility of having a bond between these atoms.
That's where the distance matrix comes in. But if a bond were made,
you'd have a statement right after the distance matrix saying
something like linking atom ... and atom It doesn't happen, and
the reason is the
Thankyou very much Tsjerk, indeed this was the problem. I am most relieved this
was the solution.
I had assumed the distance was an upper bound on the acceptable distance.
- Original Message
From: Tsjerk Wassenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Hi,
does the following specbond.dat line build a double bond between the two atoms?
CHU C3 2 CHV C4 2 0.2 CHU CHV
What would happen if the first number was 2 but the second number was 1 ?
Would two C4s need to be at the right distance away from the one C3?
Thanks,
I suggest consulting the wiki:
http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/specbond.dat
-Justin
Grange Hermitage wrote:
Hi,
does the following specbond.dat line build a double bond between the
two atoms?
CHUC3 2 CHVC4 2 0.2CHUCHV
What would happen if the first
HI users,
I have embedded protein in popc bilayer and ran the minimisation
succesfully , before going equilibration I would like to confirm one thing that
how to run the equilibration with on which system keep position restrain?
1.we will keep position restrain on all the
minnale wrote:
HI users,
I have embedded protein in popc bilayer and ran the minimisation
succesfully , before going equilibration I would like to confirm one
thing that how to run the equilibration with on which system keep
position restrain?
1.we will keep position restrain on
HI users,
I have embedded protein in popc bilayer and ran the minimisation
succesfully , before going equilibration I would like to confirm one thing that
how to run the equilibration with on which system keep position restrain?
1.we will keep position restrain on all the
Thanks for your prompt reply, according to you for membrane protein protocols
keep restrain only on protein but not on lipid and water, is there any
possibility to move water inside pore of the membrane when keep restrain only
on protein.
Could you please tell me
Thanks a lot in advance
On
Thanks for your prompt reply, according to you for membrane protein protocols
keep restrain only on protein but not on lipid and water, is there any
possibility to move water inside pore of the membrane when keep restrain only
on protein.
Could you please tell me
Thanks a lot in advance
On
minnale wrote:
Thanks for your prompt reply, according to you for membrane protein
protocols keep restrain only on protein but not on lipid and water, is
there any possibility to move water inside pore of the membrane when
keep restrain only on protein.
Could you please tell me
Thanks a
Thanks for your invaluable reply to Justin and syma.
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 Justin A.Lemkul wrote :
minnale wrote:
Thanks for your prompt reply, according to you for membrane protein
protocols keep restrain only on protein but not on lipid and water, is there
any possibility to move
Hi,
If the position restraints are only on the protein, then the water and lipids
are free to move about- assuming you have a cavity in your protein wide enough
to accommodate water- then water (or lipids) depending on the nature and
location of the cavity, should move in as a vacuum is not
Hello,
I am attempting to use AFM pulling on a 17 amino acid peptide, but am having
trouble with the 'group' concept. I've read the manual and searched sample
XXX.ndx files, but have had no luck. How would I define the first amino acid
as the reference group (i.e. - fixed in space) and the last
I found the tpbconv tool very usefull for generating tpr files for
resuming the simulations. Nevertheless I couldn't find an option to
set/change the number of processors to use as the -np option in grompp. Is
there a way to do this?
___
gmx-users
HI,
When I use the merge command along with pdb2gmx to form inter disulphide
bonds between two different chains, its removing a water molecule to connect
the two ends. Its like forming a peptide bond which I dont wish. Is there
any way to tell to gromacs, to create the inter dishulphide bonds
Thanks for your response Berk.
I have never heard of GROMOS 53b6. Does it exist?
Yes it does. I have a pdf with parameters for GROMOS 53A6 and GROMOS
53B6 (vacuo). After attempting to locate the source it appears to be
distributed to us (the pdf) when someone from Zurich was visiting.
Hi
I want to use grace 5.1.9 (normally xmvgr). each time i do installation
using ./configure, it prompts motif not found .
So i tried to find free softare openmotif (it can do the same work as
motif). Having successfully installed openmotif , the grace installation ,
however, still tells me
19 matches
Mail list logo