dear sir
i am not aware of wheather interface is gamess UK or gamess US .but one thing
if run configure -help command in terminal, it shows the option --with Gamess
.sorry i am not able to reply correctely since i am beginner also in
application side please sir be in touch .i am ver glad of
Hi Suman,
I think this discussion would be better placed on the developers-list
(but I'm not sure you're subscribed to that so I'll keep it here).
First, I think it's not a good idea (and it's against Gromacs
philosophy) to remove functionality, as this will disallow repeating
earlier studies.
g_traj
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 5:52 AM, rams rams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear users,
Is it possible to monitor the center of mass motion of a protein using
gromacs tools since this is the one to monitor in most of the dynamical
studies of the protein.
Thanks in advance.
Ram.
Hi,
There's no prescription. Check the papers by Åqvist.
Ran.
Raghunadha Reddy Burri wrote:
Dear all,
I hope van der waals and electrostatic scaling factors in the LIE
equation (g_lie) are system dependent (Ref: DK Jones-hertzog et al.
1996). Any one please give me a suggestion to calculate
I am getting following error while setting up a minimization.
---
Program grompp, VERSION 3.3.3
Source code file: toputil.c, line: 61
Fatal error:
Atomtype 'OWT3' not found!
---
I have no idea why this is happening and
Hello,
Please give me a hint. Is it possible to calculate an autocorrelation
function of interaction energy between some groups in a system using
gromacs standard tools?
For example, ACF of interaction energy between protein and water.
Thanks.
--
Vitaly
Vitaly Chaban wrote:
Hello,
Please give me a hint. Is it possible to calculate an autocorrelation
function of interaction energy between some groups in a system using
gromacs standard tools?
For example, ACF of interaction energy between protein and water.
Thanks.
g_energy
--
David van der
Manoj Kumar Singh wrote:
I am getting following error while setting up a minimization.
---
Program grompp, VERSION 3.3.3
Source code file: toputil.c, line: 61
Fatal error:
Atomtype 'OWT3' not found!
---
I have no idea why
Dear Tsjerk,
thanks for your response. It makes sense.
Once I am through with my current project that I am busy with, I might
take up this implementation more seriously and actively. By that time I
need to be in a position to be able to look into the Gromacs source code
and understand how
Suman Chakrabarty wrote:
Dear Tsjerk,
thanks for your response. It makes sense.
Once I am through with my current project that I am busy with, I might
take up this implementation more seriously and actively. By that time I
need to be in a position to be able to look into the Gromacs
As far as I know most of this stuff is being worked on by Berk Hess.
In standard GROMACS you can use tabulated potentials for everything
bonded and non-bonded, if that helps overcome the harmonic-only problem.
In which version are tabulated potentials available?
Thanks,
Ran
Ran Friedman wrote:
As far as I know most of this stuff is being worked on by Berk Hess.
In standard GROMACS you can use tabulated potentials for everything
bonded and non-bonded, if that helps overcome the harmonic-only problem.
In which version are tabulated potentials available?
This is to report some results that I have been recently obtaining with the
G53a6 parameterization of DPPC and also to ask for advice. I have read in
the mailing list that perhaps this parameterization is worse than that of
Tieleman/Berger to reproduce bilayer properties but I didnt think that
Thank you for your reply. I tried the following:
VMD computes distances between pairs of atoms to draw a bond. So I
think your atoms are too distanced from each other.
Check the bond distribution during MD and compare with your topology.
C-CL should be around 1.76A.
In 1,1,1-trichloroethane
minnale wrote:
Hi all,
I have done popc simulation for 5ns and calculated potential energy of
POPC. The values started from -269000 kj/mol reduced to -272000 kj/mol.
Could you please tell me
1.is it require to extend my simulation from 5ns?
What properties are you interested in?
Manoj Kumar Singh wrote:
I am getting following error while setting up a minimization.
---
Program grompp, VERSION 3.3.3
Source code file: toputil.c, line: 61
Fatal error:
Atomtype 'OWT3' not found!
---
I have no idea
Hi, Gromacs users,
This command grompp_ompi -np 6 -f pr_10_200.mdp -c
after_em_newton_1000.gro -p all.top -o pr_10_100.tpr -po
mdrun_pr_10_100.mdp run normally. But when i run the next command mpirun
-np 6 mdrun_ompi -s pr_10_100.tpr -c after_pr_10_100.gro -o
after_pr_10_100.trr -e
attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20080902/72ce4b1d/attachment-0001.html
--
--
Dr. Carsten Selle
University of Leipzig
Institute for Experimental Physics I
PWM
Linnestr. 5
D-04103 Leipzig
Germany
tel +49 341
I may have discovered the solution to my own problem, so I'll post it here just
as a follow-up. It appears that inflation of a POPE bilayer causes extremely
favorable interactions within the PE headgroup, causing the amine moiety to
collapse into the phosphate. This generates the near
I have been able to get the molecules to become more homogenous. The problem
was I wasn't running the system long enough. I looked at the energy of the
system though and am getting very large fluctuations. The system was ran
with the initial temperature set at 300K by setting inital velocities,
So I was testing on VMD the C-CL bond distance to draw a bond.
Actually, the limit was a disturbing 1.80A ! So close to the 1.81A you
need :(
Solutions !
1) Use dynamic bonds representation and set the cut-off to 1.81 or more
2) Find where VMD sets it's standard cutoff for bonds and set it to
You have problems with your force field.
If you send me all the files describing your system I'll try to see
what really happens when I have free time..
2008/9/2 Andy Shelley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have been able to get the molecules to become more homogenous. The problem
was I wasn't running
Dear all,
a similar problem was proposed in this list in 2002:
http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2002-August/002339.html
I cannot solve my problem, when testing tip5p in gromacs.
T( c) density((g/cm^3) -E(kcal/mol)
REF125.0 0.999
Hi All
I am trying to analyze the dynamics of polymer of GlcN residues using
ffG53a6 force field.
I made a new building block in .rtp file, but I haven´t the charge of some
atoms.
Which is the best procedure to obtein new charges?
Someone has experience about this?
Any help would be appreciated
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I am trying to analyze the dynamics of polymer of GlcN residues using
ffG53a6 force field.
I made a new building block in .rtp file, but I haven´t the charge of some
atoms.
Which is the best procedure to obtein new charges?
For some general information, refer
Hi all,
I am confusing while calculating hydrogen bonds of my protein.I issued this
command g_hbond -f .xtc -s .tpr -num .xvg
I didnt mention .ndx because I wanted to know the H-bonds in whole protein
system. I have selected mainchain+H two times, command went fine and it showed
Select
1NIT N1 1 -0.552 0.004 -0.026
1NIT N2 2 0.552 -0.004 0.026
2.0 2.0 1.2
Andy,
If I were your system, I would explode immediately and never let run myself again.
b0 (N-N) = (0.552+0.552)=1.104 nm. How should the system behave with such unrealistic solvent and huge
minnale wrote:
Hi all,
I am confusing while calculating hydrogen bonds of my protein.I issued
this command g_hbond -f .xtc -s .tpr -num .xvg
I didnt mention .ndx because I wanted to know the H-bonds in whole
protein system. I have selected mainchain+H two times, command went fine
and it
Hi,
When the question is what's the dynamics of a GlcN chain?, it is
quite important to have a proper set of parameters. If the question is
what would a protein do when something resembling a GlcN chain is
inserted (e.g. Lysozyme)? then you may get away using a set of
parameters derived from
gurgo Hi All
gurgo I am trying to analyze the dynamics of polymer of GlcN residues using
gurgo ffG53a6 force field.
gurgo I made a new building block in .rtp file, but I havenґt the charge of
some
gurgo atoms.
gurgo Which is the best procedure to obtein new charges?
gurgo Someone has experience
Dear users,
To calculate the rotational auto correlation functions, the command
mentioned in the maual is:
g_rotacf -P 1 -nparm 2 -fft -n index -o .xvg -fa -beginfit -endfit
what are the -nparm and -fa options are meant for ?
Also do we need to use -fitfn option to obtain the rotational auto
I'm looking into using g_sdf for analysis. The instructions suggest
using gOpenMol: The output will be a binary 3D-grid file
(gom_plt.dat) in the .plt format that can be be read directly by
gOpenMol.
However, the gOpenMol web site does not distribute Mac binaries (nor
source). I am using Mac OS
Dear users,
I have given a command like the following to calculate the rotational auto
correlation function:
g_rotacf -f .trr -s .tpr -P 2 -fft -o .xvg -b -e 1 -n .ndx -d
I want to use the second order Legendre polynomial to fit. I integrated the
resulting .xvg file, to obtain the
Jeff Woodford wrote:
Hi all,
Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but:
I am attempting to simulate the interaction between a peptide and a DNA
strand using the OPLS/AA force field. However the parameters for the
DNA bases don’t appear to be included. Where might I find these
Hello,
somebode told me, that VMD is also able to render the SDF plot.
However I have not tested it so far.
Good Luck,
Flo
On 03.09.2008, at 01:28, Matt Wyczalkowski wrote:
I'm looking into using g_sdf for analysis. The instructions suggest
using gOpenMol: The output will be a binary
Hi, Gromacs users,
I was caught by a big problem with molecular dynamic investigation of an
cyclic peptide nanotube. When i do energy minimization with em.mdp parameter
file as follows, it gave out a warning: Warning: 1-4 interaction between 135
and 144 at distance larger than 1 nm. I ignored it
Thanks Justin for your valuable suggestions
I have done the way you suggested. I gave command like this
g_hbond -f .xtc -s .tpr .ndx(contain 5 residues mainchain+H 25 atoms) -num
.xvg -hbm .xpm
it showed
Select a group: 15
Selected 15: 'MainChain+H__r_22_50_56_121_22'
Select a group: 15
37 matches
Mail list logo