Re: [gmx-users] QMMM

2008-09-02 Thread vidhya sankar
  dear sir i am not aware of wheather interface is gamess UK or gamess US .but one thing if run configure -help command  in terminal, it shows the option  --with Gamess .sorry i am not able to reply correctely since i am beginner also in application side please sir be in touch .i am ver glad of

Re: [gmx-users] Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD)

2008-09-02 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Suman, I think this discussion would be better placed on the developers-list (but I'm not sure you're subscribed to that so I'll keep it here). First, I think it's not a good idea (and it's against Gromacs philosophy) to remove functionality, as this will disallow repeating earlier studies.

Re: [gmx-users] COM monitoring

2008-09-02 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
g_traj On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 5:52 AM, rams rams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear users, Is it possible to monitor the center of mass motion of a protein using gromacs tools since this is the one to monitor in most of the dynamical studies of the protein. Thanks in advance. Ram.

Re: [gmx-users] How to calculate scaling factors in the LIE equation

2008-09-02 Thread Ran Friedman
Hi, There's no prescription. Check the papers by Åqvist. Ran. Raghunadha Reddy Burri wrote: Dear all, I hope van der waals and electrostatic scaling factors in the LIE equation (g_lie) are system dependent (Ref: DK Jones-hertzog et al. 1996). Any one please give me a suggestion to calculate

[gmx-users] Fatal error: Atomtype 'OWT3' not found!

2008-09-02 Thread Manoj Kumar Singh
I am getting following error while setting up a minimization. --- Program grompp, VERSION 3.3.3 Source code file: toputil.c, line: 61 Fatal error: Atomtype 'OWT3' not found! --- I have no idea why this is happening and

[gmx-users] potential energy ACF

2008-09-02 Thread Vitaly Chaban
Hello, Please give me a hint. Is it possible to calculate an autocorrelation function of interaction energy between some groups in a system using gromacs standard tools? For example, ACF of interaction energy between protein and water. Thanks. -- Vitaly

Re: [gmx-users] potential energy ACF

2008-09-02 Thread David van der Spoel
Vitaly Chaban wrote: Hello, Please give me a hint. Is it possible to calculate an autocorrelation function of interaction energy between some groups in a system using gromacs standard tools? For example, ACF of interaction energy between protein and water. Thanks. g_energy -- David van der

Re: [gmx-users] Fatal error: Atomtype 'OWT3' not found!

2008-09-02 Thread David van der Spoel
Manoj Kumar Singh wrote: I am getting following error while setting up a minimization. --- Program grompp, VERSION 3.3.3 Source code file: toputil.c, line: 61 Fatal error: Atomtype 'OWT3' not found! --- I have no idea why

Re: [gmx-users] Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD)

2008-09-02 Thread Suman Chakrabarty
Dear Tsjerk, thanks for your response. It makes sense. Once I am through with my current project that I am busy with, I might take up this implementation more seriously and actively. By that time I need to be in a position to be able to look into the Gromacs source code and understand how

Re: [gmx-users] Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD)

2008-09-02 Thread David van der Spoel
Suman Chakrabarty wrote: Dear Tsjerk, thanks for your response. It makes sense. Once I am through with my current project that I am busy with, I might take up this implementation more seriously and actively. By that time I need to be in a position to be able to look into the Gromacs

Re: [gmx-users] Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD)

2008-09-02 Thread Ran Friedman
As far as I know most of this stuff is being worked on by Berk Hess. In standard GROMACS you can use tabulated potentials for everything bonded and non-bonded, if that helps overcome the harmonic-only problem. In which version are tabulated potentials available? Thanks, Ran

Re: [gmx-users] Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD)

2008-09-02 Thread David van der Spoel
Ran Friedman wrote: As far as I know most of this stuff is being worked on by Berk Hess. In standard GROMACS you can use tabulated potentials for everything bonded and non-bonded, if that helps overcome the harmonic-only problem. In which version are tabulated potentials available?

[gmx-users] G53a6 parameterization for DPPC

2008-09-02 Thread Ángel Piñeiro
This is to report some results that I have been recently obtaining with the G53a6 parameterization of DPPC and also to ask for advice. I have read in the mailing list that perhaps this parameterization is worse than that of Tieleman/Berger to reproduce bilayer properties but I didn’t think that

Re: [gmx-users] Bonds missing in VMD visualization

2008-09-02 Thread Andreas Kring
Thank you for your reply. I tried the following: VMD computes distances between pairs of atoms to draw a bond. So I think your atoms are too distanced from each other. Check the bond distribution during MD and compare with your topology. C-CL should be around 1.76A. In 1,1,1-trichloroethane

Re: [gmx-users] Potential energy of POPC

2008-09-02 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
minnale wrote: Hi all, I have done popc simulation for 5ns and calculated potential energy of POPC. The values started from -269000 kj/mol reduced to -272000 kj/mol. Could you please tell me 1.is it require to extend my simulation from 5ns? What properties are you interested in?

Re: [gmx-users] Fatal error: Atomtype 'OWT3' not found!

2008-09-02 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Manoj Kumar Singh wrote: I am getting following error while setting up a minimization. --- Program grompp, VERSION 3.3.3 Source code file: toputil.c, line: 61 Fatal error: Atomtype 'OWT3' not found! --- I have no idea

[gmx-users] problem with mpirun

2008-09-02 Thread huifang liu
Hi, Gromacs users, This command grompp_ompi -np 6 -f pr_10_200.mdp -c after_em_newton_1000.gro -p all.top -o pr_10_100.tpr -po mdrun_pr_10_100.mdp run normally. But when i run the next command mpirun -np 6 mdrun_ompi -s pr_10_100.tpr -c after_pr_10_100.gro -o after_pr_10_100.trr -e

[gmx-users] RE: Potential energy of POPC (minnale )

2008-09-02 Thread Carsten Selle
attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20080902/72ce4b1d/attachment-0001.html -- -- Dr. Carsten Selle University of Leipzig Institute for Experimental Physics I PWM Linnestr. 5 D-04103 Leipzig Germany tel +49 341

Re: [gmx-users] Strange behavior from steepest descents

2008-09-02 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
I may have discovered the solution to my own problem, so I'll post it here just as a follow-up. It appears that inflation of a POPE bilayer causes extremely favorable interactions within the PE headgroup, causing the amine moiety to collapse into the phosphate. This generates the near

[gmx-users] Re: Re[2]: Using Morse potentials with ENCAD force field

2008-09-02 Thread Andy Shelley
I have been able to get the molecules to become more homogenous. The problem was I wasn't running the system long enough. I looked at the energy of the system though and am getting very large fluctuations. The system was ran with the initial temperature set at 300K by setting inital velocities,

Re: [gmx-users] Bonds missing in VMD visualization

2008-09-02 Thread Diego Enry
So I was testing on VMD the C-CL bond distance to draw a bond. Actually, the limit was a disturbing 1.80A ! So close to the 1.81A you need :( Solutions ! 1) Use dynamic bonds representation and set the cut-off to 1.81 or more 2) Find where VMD sets it's standard cutoff for bonds and set it to

[gmx-users] Re: Re[2]: Using Morse potentials with ENCAD force field

2008-09-02 Thread Vitaly Chaban
You have problems with your force field. If you send me all the files describing your system I'll try to see what really happens when I have free time.. 2008/9/2 Andy Shelley [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have been able to get the molecules to become more homogenous. The problem was I wasn't running

[gmx-users] testing Tip5p water

2008-09-02 Thread tuyusong
Dear all, a similar problem was proposed in this list in 2002: http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2002-August/002339.html I cannot solve my problem, when testing tip5p in gromacs. T( c) density((g/cm^3) -E(kcal/mol) REF125.0 0.999

[gmx-users] charge atoms

2008-09-02 Thread cesteban
Hi All I am trying to analyze the dynamics of polymer of GlcN residues using ffG53a6 force field. I made a new building block in .rtp file, but I haven´t the charge of some atoms. Which is the best procedure to obtein new charges? Someone has experience about this? Any help would be appreciated

Re: [gmx-users] charge atoms

2008-09-02 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All I am trying to analyze the dynamics of polymer of GlcN residues using ffG53a6 force field. I made a new building block in .rtp file, but I haven´t the charge of some atoms. Which is the best procedure to obtein new charges? For some general information, refer

[gmx-users] how to make h-bond existence map?

2008-09-02 Thread minnale
Hi all, I am confusing while calculating hydrogen bonds of my protein.I issued this command g_hbond -f .xtc -s .tpr -num .xvg I didnt mention .ndx because I wanted to know the H-bonds in whole protein system. I have selected mainchain+H two times, command went fine and it showed Select

[gmx-users] Re[4]: Using Morse potentials with ENCAD force field

2008-09-02 Thread Vitaly Chaban
1NIT N1 1 -0.552 0.004 -0.026 1NIT N2 2 0.552 -0.004 0.026 2.0 2.0 1.2 Andy, If I were your system, I would explode immediately and never let run myself again. b0 (N-N) = (0.552+0.552)=1.104 nm. How should the system behave with such unrealistic solvent and huge

Re: [gmx-users] how to make h-bond existence map?

2008-09-02 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
minnale wrote: Hi all, I am confusing while calculating hydrogen bonds of my protein.I issued this command g_hbond -f .xtc -s .tpr -num .xvg I didnt mention .ndx because I wanted to know the H-bonds in whole protein system. I have selected mainchain+H two times, command went fine and it

Re: [gmx-users] charge atoms

2008-09-02 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi, When the question is what's the dynamics of a GlcN chain?, it is quite important to have a proper set of parameters. If the question is what would a protein do when something resembling a GlcN chain is inserted (e.g. Lysozyme)? then you may get away using a set of parameters derived from

[gmx-users] Re: charge atoms

2008-09-02 Thread Vitaly Chaban
gurgo Hi All gurgo I am trying to analyze the dynamics of polymer of GlcN residues using gurgo ffG53a6 force field. gurgo I made a new building block in .rtp file, but I havenґt the charge of some gurgo atoms. gurgo Which is the best procedure to obtein new charges? gurgo Someone has experience

[gmx-users] g_rotacf

2008-09-02 Thread rams rams
Dear users, To calculate the rotational auto correlation functions, the command mentioned in the maual is: g_rotacf -P 1 -nparm 2 -fft -n index -o .xvg -fa -beginfit -endfit what are the -nparm and -fa options are meant for ? Also do we need to use -fitfn option to obtain the rotational auto

[gmx-users] Visualizing g_sdf on a Mac

2008-09-02 Thread Matt Wyczalkowski
I'm looking into using g_sdf for analysis. The instructions suggest using gOpenMol: The output will be a binary 3D-grid file (gom_plt.dat) in the .plt format that can be be read directly by gOpenMol. However, the gOpenMol web site does not distribute Mac binaries (nor source). I am using Mac OS

[gmx-users] g_rotacf

2008-09-02 Thread rams rams
Dear users, I have given a command like the following to calculate the rotational auto correlation function: g_rotacf -f .trr -s .tpr -P 2 -fft -o .xvg -b -e 1 -n .ndx -d I want to use the second order Legendre polynomial to fit. I integrated the resulting .xvg file, to obtain the

Re: [gmx-users] Parameters for DNA bases

2008-09-02 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Jeff Woodford wrote: Hi all, Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but: I am attempting to simulate the interaction between a peptide and a DNA strand using the OPLS/AA force field. However the parameters for the DNA bases don’t appear to be included. Where might I find these

Re: [gmx-users] Visualizing g_sdf on a Mac

2008-09-02 Thread Florian Dommert
Hello, somebode told me, that VMD is also able to render the SDF plot. However I have not tested it so far. Good Luck, Flo On 03.09.2008, at 01:28, Matt Wyczalkowski wrote: I'm looking into using g_sdf for analysis. The instructions suggest using gOpenMol: The output will be a binary

[gmx-users] Problems with molecular dynamic investigation of an cyclic peptide nanotube

2008-09-02 Thread huifang liu
Hi, Gromacs users, I was caught by a big problem with molecular dynamic investigation of an cyclic peptide nanotube. When i do energy minimization with em.mdp parameter file as follows, it gave out a warning: Warning: 1-4 interaction between 135 and 144 at distance larger than 1 nm. I ignored it

Re: Re: [gmx-users] how to make h-bond existence map?

2008-09-02 Thread minnale
Thanks Justin for your valuable suggestions I have done the way you suggested. I gave command like this g_hbond -f .xtc -s .tpr .ndx(contain 5 residues mainchain+H 25 atoms) -num .xvg -hbm .xpm it showed Select a group: 15 Selected 15: 'MainChain+H__r_22_50_56_121_22' Select a group: 15