[gmx-users] RE: Fatal Error: number of coordinates in coordinate file does not match topology

2008-10-11 Thread Vitaly Chaban
gurgo> I want to perform MD Equilibration run under position restrained for gurgo> 200ps. Bond gurgo> distances were constrained using the LINCS (Linear Constraints) algorithm, gurgo> the water molecules were restrained using the SETTLE algorithm. In order to gurgo> do this I have modified nsteps

Re: [gmx-users] Fatal Error: number of coordinates in coordinate file does not match topology

2008-10-11 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Chitrita, Please copy-paste the exact error and the command line in both cases (working and not working). Also, what platform are you working on? Did you by chance edit the .mdp file under windows? Cheers, Tsjerk On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Chitrita Dutta Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[gmx-users] Fatal Error: number of coordinates in coordinate file does not match topology

2008-10-11 Thread Chitrita Dutta Roy
I want to perform MD Equilibration run under position restrained for 200ps. Bond distances were constrained using the LINCS (Linear Constraints) algorithm, the water molecules were restrained using the SETTLE algorithm. In order to do this I have modified nsteps in original pr.mdp file. Following i

Re: [gmx-users] Option -shuffle, -sort, -np missing in grompp in version 4.0?

2008-10-11 Thread David van der Spoel
Martin Höfling wrote: Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2008 schrieb Lee Soin: The command grompp used to have options -shuffle, -sort and -np, but it seems that they appear no more with version 4.0? These options were used for particle decomposition in the tpr file. Gromacs 4 default method is domain

Re: [gmx-users] Simulation of a protein confined in a box

2008-10-11 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Lee Soin wrote: This seems to me a very complicated realization. Why doesn't GROMACS provide an easy way for wall simulation? How about reading manual section 7.3.20 "Walls" in the Gromacs-4.0 manual? I think that would be what you're after. -Justin 2008/10/11 Omer Markovitch <[EMAIL

Re: [gmx-users] Option -shuffle, -sort, -np missing in grompp in version 4.0?

2008-10-11 Thread Martin Höfling
Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2008 schrieb Lee Soin: > The command grompp used to have options -shuffle, -sort and -np, but it > seems that they appear no more with version 4.0? These options were used for particle decomposition in the tpr file. Gromacs 4 default method is domain decomposition, but as

Re: [gmx-users] Simulation of a protein confined in a box

2008-10-11 Thread Lee Soin
This seems to me a very complicated realization. Why doesn't GROMACS provide an easy way for wall simulation? 2008/10/11 Omer Markovitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Oh, I didn't read carefully. > My suggestion would be, perhaps, to physically put atoms on the sides of > the box (possibly, fill each sid

[gmx-users] Option -shuffle, -sort, -np missing in grompp in version 4.0?

2008-10-11 Thread Lee Soin
The command grompp used to have options -shuffle, -sort and -np, but it seems that they appear no more with version 4.0? -- Sun Li Department of Physics Nanjing University, China ___ gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://www.gromacs.org

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Protein coming out of the box

2008-10-11 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Ravi, Just come to terms with PBC: the box has no outside. Chapter 3 of the manual... Tsjerk On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 1:30 PM, ravi sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So how could i do this energy conservation, > > > Ravi Datta Sharma > Lecturer, > Bioinformatics, > Department of Microbiology, >

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Protein coming out of the box

2008-10-11 Thread ravi sharma
So how could i do this energy conservation, Ravi Datta Sharma Lecturer, Bioinformatics, Department of Microbiology, CCS Unversity, Meerut   --- On Sat, 11/10/08, sudheer babu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: sudheer babu <[EMAIL PROTECT

[gmx-users] Re: Protein coming out of the box

2008-10-11 Thread sudheer babu
Oh...Similar type of problem once I have got, so got reply from some one in archives that if use comm_grps= protein , protein will not come out of the water box.So thats why I have suggested, If I say wrong answer regret for that >* Hi, *>* Ravi *>* Use comm_grps = protein in your .mdp file. *>

Re: [gmx-users] Re:Protein coming out of the box

2008-10-11 Thread David van der Spoel
sudheer babu wrote: Hi, Ravi Use comm_grps = protein in your .mdp file. 3. protein coming out of the box (ravi sharma) No! You will ruin energy conservation... Hello everyone my protein coming out of the box in final md how can i fix my protein in the middle of

[gmx-users] Re:Protein coming out of the box

2008-10-11 Thread sudheer babu
Hi, Ravi Use comm_grps = protein in your .mdp file. > > 3. protein coming out of the box (ravi sharma) > > > Hello everyone > > my protein coming out of the box in final md how can i fix my protein in > the middle of the box. can you help me out?? > > > ___

Re: [gmx-users] protein coming out of the box

2008-10-11 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
1021 results for "protein out box" on the gromacs search page (mailing list search). The first so many are relevant. Why not checking the archives first? Oh, and it's mentioned in the wiki too. Tsjerk On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:03 AM, ravi sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello everyone > >

Re: [gmx-users] Opinion: Can position restraining waters increase the speed of the md simulation?

2008-10-11 Thread Suman Chakrabarty
On a related note, I remember reading a paper recently, where they take a few shells of water molecules with full atomicity, but "continuum" beyond that. They also took care about the exchange between the "molecular" water shell and the continuum as the polymer/protein conformation changes during t

[gmx-users] protein coming out of the box

2008-10-11 Thread ravi sharma
Hello everyone my protein coming out of the box in final md how can i fix my protein in the middle of the box. can you help me out?? Thanks Ravi Datta Sharma Lecturer, Bioinformatics, Department of Microbiology, CCS Unversity, Meerut

Re: [gmx-users] Opinion: Can position restraining waters increase the speed of the md simulation?

2008-10-11 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Art, You could, but should you? What do you think to gain? One layer of water is approximately 2.5 A, so with 6 you'd have about two layers of water 'free'. With position restraints on the rest, you'd still be calculating all forces and such, so there's not much gain there. On top of that, the

Re: [gmx-users] Simulation of a protein confined in a box

2008-10-11 Thread Omer Markovitch
Oh, I didn't read carefully. My suggestion would be, perhaps, to physically put atoms on the sides of the box (possibly, fill each side completely), and to place on them very high repulsion. You might want to freeze them up, and exclude their self interactions from the energy calculation. Good gue

Re: [gmx-users] Simulation of a protein confined in a box

2008-10-11 Thread Suman Chakrabarty
Possibly what he is interested in is a system WITHOUT PBC? I don't think with PBC the system is really "confined", since there is no true wall to reflect the colliding molecules. Thus to study the effect of real confinement, it is necessary to remove PBC and impose reflective boundary conditions. I